Chris Travers wrote:
>
>
> Hmm. I have worked in places where they don't want people to be
> able to
> look up home numbers/addresses of other employees... Also possibly for
> outsourced bookkeepers... I would think inheriting the read_contact
> right should cover this case, m
On 8/9/07, John Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Chris Travers wrote:
> >
> > I think we should probably add some summary roles too which allow one
> > to provide broad permissions across modules instead of having to
> > create them all. Furthermore, we should be able to extend this (maybe
>
Chris Travers wrote:
>
> I think we should probably add some summary roles too which allow one
> to provide broad permissions across modules instead of having to
> create them all. Furthermore, we should be able to extend this (maybe
> in 1.4) to be able to define custom roles with certain permis
Hi;
For those of you on the public lists, this is designed to get public
feedback. We on the core team are likely to make a decision on whether to
formally adopt such guidelines in part based on community feedback and (to a
larger extent) what we feel is necessary for the project. The purpose I
Just to expand on this-- the other reason for asking people to take credit
for infrastructure beyond our control is that it shows people that we *do*
have an active community who are involved in the pushing the project
forward. It is nice to show that off a little :-)
I will be submitting draft g
Hi Chris;
Sorry for the misunderstandings. I never heard back from you so... maybe
everyone is talking past eachother. My appologies too :-)
The concerns were just that the web site design and domain name gave the
impression that they were a part of our core infrastructure while the core
team d
Chris Travers wrote:
> Hi;
>
> I think there are questions as to the utility of forums. I will give
> my list of pros/cons here.
>
> Pros:
> There is some question whether our target market will be happier on
> forums as we move into more of the Quickbooks Basic market. Maybe.
>
> Cons:
>
On 8/9/07, John Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Wow. This looks very complicated, quite involved, and a pain in the butt
> to administer. And my suggestions will probably make it worse...
It is replacing the "hide menu options" buttons.
I think we should probably add some summary ro
Hi,
Wow. This looks very complicated, quite involved, and a pain in the butt
to administer. And my suggestions will probably make it worse...
I'm not seeing anything wrong with the list, but I'm wondering about
what's missing. What comes to mind are contact management things, like
associating con
Some information is presumed public (meaning user-accessible), such as the
structure of the CoA but not necessarily the balances or transactions. We
could add permissions on these somewhere in 1.4 as well but the dependencies
are likely to take a while to sort out.
I: Contact Management:
create_c
Hi;
I think there are questions as to the utility of forums. I will give my
list of pros/cons here.
Pros:
There is some question whether our target market will be happier on forums
as we move into more of the Quickbooks Basic market. Maybe.
Cons:
Mailing lists allow for generally better co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ed W wrote:
> Hi
ion is frequently better than it is on most
> mailing list archives). I guess it's just like the netnews guys who
> moan that it's a much better system than email, and yet how many
> projects reach for a newsgroup before they setup
Hi
> I wasn't going to say anything, but now that Josh has I'll chime in too. I
> agree with Josh's statement above, and I can add to it. One of my current
> clients (a fairly popular distro vendor) actually tried to move to forums
> about a year or so ago. The backlash was so bad that they ha
On Thursday 09 August 2007 12:27:30 Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > As a matter of fact, I usually require the existence of an open Forum
> > before seriously considering any software for use or recommendation.
> > To date it has been the perfect litmus test. Since then, I've never
> > picked any dead-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I completely agree with what you're doing -- as a contributor to other
> open-source projects I can attest that mailing lists only benefit
> project developers and some technologically-literate users.
> Mainstream acce
15 matches
Mail list logo
