Hi Grant,
IANAL, but I don't think that is the reason. See below.
On 8/22/07, Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 8/21/07, Chris Travers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Are nVidia's closed source driver components for Linux a GPL
> violation? If
> > so, why has nobody tried to enforce
On 8/21/07, Chris Travers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are nVidia's closed source driver components for Linux a GPL violation? If
> so, why has nobody tried to enforce this over the substantial time that this
> has been going on? Thus does the GPL actually guarantee the user any rights
> that the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Guys,
>
> This whole discussion is pointless. We got the code under the GPL; our
> only choice to change licenses is GPLv3.
>
> Since we're incrementally replacing Dieter's code, we can't ever
> relicense it.
Once dieters cod
