Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Site for LedgerSMB Forum

2007-08-23 Thread Jeff Kowalczyk
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:16:20 -0400, Eloi George wrote: > ... forums provide a way to get the more non-technical involved / > interested in the product. ... Ledger-SMB seems to be more targeting the > small to medium business owner that can't afford an IT person and > doesn't have the time or patien

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] GPL v3? Other license options?

2007-08-23 Thread Chris Travers
BTW, I have changed my mind after yet another reading of the GPL v3. There is almost no way I will support a move to this license. I have found that problems I have had with earier drafts over additional restrictions to code being added by other people are still present in the released license.

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Site for LedgerSMB Forum

2007-08-23 Thread Chris Travers
Hi; On 8/23/07, Eloi George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ok, I see what you mean. However my assertion was never about what > should be the -main- thrust of communication. That's decided by the > community. I'm just saying that forums provide a way to get the more > non-technical involved

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Site for LedgerSMB Forum

2007-08-23 Thread Eloi George
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > I am disagreeing. The main thrust of communication about all of the > above is mailing lists, not web based forums, with the exception of > maybe Ubuntu. > Ok, I see what you mean. However my assertion was never about what should be the -main- thrust of communication

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Site for LedgerSMB Forum

2007-08-23 Thread Joshua D. Drake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Eloi George wrote: > Hi! > > Sorry for the late response. Forgot to add this mailing list to my > daily ToDos. > I think it's great that it simply turned out to be a case of > miscommunication & that things are moving along again! > > There was

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Site for LedgerSMB Forum

2007-08-23 Thread Eloi George
Hi! Sorry for the late response. Forgot to add this mailing list to my daily ToDos. I think it's great that it simply turned out to be a case of miscommunication & that things are moving along again! There was a confusing reply to my post however... Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> As a matter of