On Nov 25, 2007 8:09 PM, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Although a correct view it is not a practical view :), which is my
> point. Normalizing out past (really 3rd) 4th form becomes not only a
> serious conceptual problem but an even more serious application problem
> in terms of pe
Chris Travers wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2007 9:53 AM, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> 1: The database should be designed independently of the application
>>> at first. All fields in the database should be semantically atomic
>>> and should be broken out as much as possible. Additionall
