Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Ledger-SMB 1.2.13 validation tarball-- are we OK to release?

2008-02-22 Thread Chris Travers
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 7:05 PM, David A. Bandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Chris Travers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Hi all; > > > > Any concerns about releasing 1.2.13 from the validation tarball. > > I've hit almost every single page w/ no errors (or I'd

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Ledger-SMB 1.2.13 validation tarball-- are we OK to release?

2008-02-22 Thread David A. Bandel
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Chris Travers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all; > > Any concerns about releasing 1.2.13 from the validation tarball. I've hit almost every single page w/ no errors (or I'd have reported). I may have missed something, but it's not obvious. Ciao, David A. Bande

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Ledger-SMB 1.2.13 validation tarball-- are we OK to release?

2008-02-22 Thread Joshua D. Drake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:33:41 -0800 "Chris Travers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all; > > Any concerns about releasing 1.2.13 from the validation tarball. > > B est Wishes, > Chris Travers no - -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.co

[Ledger-smb-devel] Ledger-SMB 1.2.13 validation tarball-- are we OK to release?

2008-02-22 Thread Chris Travers
Hi all; Any concerns about releasing 1.2.13 from the validation tarball. B est Wishes, Chris Travers - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MR