Quoting Chris Travers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The major drawback is that anything which hits this field needs to join
> against the (much-larger) acc_trans table. This means that there is a
> performance cost in large installations where these fields are used (AP/AP
> Reports, payment handling, etc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 13:56:28 -0700
"Chris Travers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The major drawback is that anything which hits this field needs to
> join against the (much-larger) acc_trans table. This means that
> there is a performance cost in large
Hi all;
One of the problems which occasionally happens for people trying to work
with LSMB is that summary information can get out of date. This is expected
to be a further issue for SQL-Ledger 2.8 migrations because of specifics on
how that information is calculated.
It seems to me that the bes
