Hello Ed:
I have been following this thread on and off so please forgive me if I am
completely off the tangent.
You know with any work one should really define the scope before there can
be a cost and etc., and in this case here not having the scope could hurt
you in convenincing anyone to chip i
Hi all;
1.2.14-rc1 is now available for testing from our sourceforge site.
The changelog is:
* Build.PL now requires Test::Trap (Chris T, 1872529)
* Fixed double escaping of tex under some circumstances (Seneca)
* Added fix for bad summary information in AR/AP transactions (1800065,
1800069, Chri
Chris Travers wrote:
> Ed;
>
> Actually, you make a good point. If there is this sort of demand (and
> I think there is), we should look at accommodating it.
>
> To date, we have largely avoided donations and encouraged people to
> pay businesses building the software directly. Maybe this ought t
Ed;
Actually, you make a good point. If there is this sort of demand (and
I think there is), we should look at accommodating it.
To date, we have largely avoided donations and encouraged people to
pay businesses building the software directly. Maybe this ought to
change.
Best Wishes,
Chris Tra
Chris Travers wrote:
> However, what is likely to take the most time (not labor) is just
> coordination with the community, making sure that what is generally
> applicable is separated from that which is not, etc.
>
I think you and Joshua are arguing against the very thing I am trying to
achie
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Ed W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> I won't presume to speak for the core devs, but I gather the limiting
> factor is time availability for the people with commit rights.
>
>
>
> And to be clear I am hoping to rent 1-2+ months of full time
>
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 21:40 +0100, Ed W wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > Well one issue you are going to run into is cost. I don't know about
> > Chris but for us to do that you are going to have to come up with (even
> > with a discounted rate) 20k+. That is with a significant discount off o
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
I won't presume to speak for the core devs, but I gather the limiting
factor is time availability for the people with commit rights.
And to be clear I am hoping to rent 1-2+ months of full time
development from 1+ core developer. If this doesn't buy a substantia
I would just like to Josh's points that 99% of my work at the moment
is going into 1.3. THere are a few more things that need to be done,
but it is moving ahead fast.
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
-
Check out the new SourceForg
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 21:06 +0100, Ed W wrote:
> Jeff Kowalczyk wrote:
> > I won't presume to speak for the core devs, but I gather the limiting
> > factor is time availability for the people with commit rights.
> >
>
> And to be clear I am hoping to rent 1-2+ months of full time
> developm
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 15:47 -0400, Jeff Kowalczyk wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 19:03:22 +0100, Ed W wrote:
> > I am interested in renting some time from someone like Chris (or
> > similar) to advance progress of the next branch and get it "stable".
> > Would anyone else like to chip in? I would
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 2:11 AM, Florian Reitmeir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Jun 2008, Stroller wrote:
>
>> On 2 Jun 2008, at 12:33, Florian Reitmeir wrote:
>> > ...
>> > we use Ledger SMB now for a while .. and have customers with a
>> > large number
>> > of addresses.
>> >
>> > So its
On Mon, 02 Jun 2008, Stroller wrote:
> On 2 Jun 2008, at 12:33, Florian Reitmeir wrote:
> > ...
> > we use Ledger SMB now for a while .. and have customers with a
> > large number
> > of addresses.
> >
> > So its important for us, to see the customer number, while selecting a
> > customer, and n
13 matches
Mail list logo
