Chris Travers wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Roderick A. Anderson
> wrote:
>> I lost my test install of LedgerSMB before converting it to something
>> I'd use so I have a blank sheet to work from.
>>
>> I believe several people have installed and are using 1.3. Since I will
>> have a
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Roderick A. Anderson
wrote:
> I lost my test install of LedgerSMB before converting it to something
> I'd use so I have a blank sheet to work from.
>
> I believe several people have installed and are using 1.3. Since I will
> have a very low usage I was thinking
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:50:35 -0800, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
> would this be the 1.2-experimental branch?
trunk is 1.3. At some point in the beta cycle, it would move to a branch
to open trunk for 1.4 features.
Jeff
I lost my test install of LedgerSMB before converting it to something
I'd use so I have a blank sheet to work from.
I believe several people have installed and are using 1.3. Since I will
have a very low usage I was thinking I should give 1.3 a whirl instead
of the 1.2 branch then updating. A
