Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Upcoming 2.0 of LedgerSMB

2010-07-25 Thread Stroller
On 25 Jul 2010, at 19:02, Jeff Kowalczyk wrote: > Joshua D. Drake writes: >> I firmly believe we need to eliminate Latex or at least not make it a >> requirement and move to more modern technologies to generate >> invoices. > > I appreciate and like LaTeX output. LaTeX::Table [1] seemed like

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Upcoming 2.0 of LedgerSMB

2010-07-25 Thread Darren Wiebe
On 24/07/2010 4:49 PM, David A. Bandel wrote: > On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 17:08, David F. Skoll wrote: > >> Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> >> >>> Latex may be great for you but if I walk into an office and say, "Sue, >>> here is how you customize templates" and its tex? I might as well walk >>>

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Upcoming 2.0 of LedgerSMB

2010-07-25 Thread Jeff Kowalczyk
Joshua D. Drake writes: > I firmly believe we need to eliminate Latex or at least not make it a > requirement and move to more modern technologies to generate invoices. I appreciate and like LaTeX output. LaTeX::Table [1] seemed like something I would want to build templates around. The problem w

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Upcoming 2.0 of LedgerSMB

2010-07-25 Thread Jeff Kowalczyk
Joshua D. Drake writes: > Lastly, for 2.0 we are moving to Git. We have already created the > repository and will slowly begin to populate over the coming months. > > http://github.com/commandprompt/LedgerSMB The migration to git would be most welcome. Would it not be better to make a clean* svn

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Upcoming 2.0 of LedgerSMB

2010-07-25 Thread Walter Vargas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello from Venezuela About the intention to eliminate LaTeX, I think, you can have something like templates in XML or DocBook, and then convert to other formats, including LaTeX. In fact, one of the features that I like is that I can make invoices in