On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 11:00 -0700, John Locke wrote:
> Hello,
> One other potential reason to move: the power tools for managing Drupal
> (drush being the main one) now depend on relatively recent versions of
> PHP -- at least PHP 5.2. Your server's reporting 5.1.6. That can mean
> the differen
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 12:36 PM, John Locke wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> There are a couple questions I'd like to discuss with the other core
>> team members a little more before offering some concrete steps
>> forward. Historically, the core committee has been in charge of
>> infrastructure for the most pa
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Luke wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Oct 2010, Chris Travers wrote:
>
>> However there is also a basic question to the community:
>>
>> What can we do to facilitate cooperation and contribution from the community?
> If the site managers need to communicate beyond simple email,
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010, Chris Travers wrote:
> However there is also a basic question to the community:
>
> What can we do to facilitate cooperation and contribution from the community?
Bluntly, and hopefully without offense: Get out of the way.
> I have a few basic ideas, still very poorly formed,
Hi,
> There are a couple questions I'd like to discuss with the other core
> team members a little more before offering some concrete steps
> forward. Historically, the core committee has been in charge of
> infrastructure for the most part, but this hasn't really worked as
> well as I'd like. W
There are a couple questions I'd like to discuss with the other core
team members a little more before offering some concrete steps
forward. Historically, the core committee has been in charge of
infrastructure for the most part, but this hasn't really worked as
well as I'd like. We've seen issue
Hello,
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> I am not really interested in moving the site but I am certainly
> interested in having people contribute to the success of it. I even put
> out a call for people to help us in the past.
>
> I have disabled the comments for now. People should be using the mailing
On Sun, 2010-10-03 at 12:06 -0700, John Locke wrote:
> "Hi,
> I hope you will consider this proposal -- we like LedgerSMB and want
> to see it succeed.
I am not really interested in moving the site but I am certainly
interested in having people contribute to the success of it. I even put
out a ca
