On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 06:06 -0400, Luke wrote:
>
> That said, however, I have noticed a little apparent black-boxism in
> overall management. Discussions happen on subjects, then fall silent.
> Months later, a decision may be published. In the meantime, nobody
> outside has a clue what is go
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 09:29 +0100, Stroller wrote:
> Stroller.
Thank you for you vent.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twi
On Monday 04 October 2010 11:47:44 Chris Travers wrote:
> What can we do to facilitate cooperation and contribution from the
> community?
Be more receptive to basic user needs like email and printing that don't work
out of the box.
My problems with email recently were too quickly dismissed.
Pri
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010, Chris Travers wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Luke wrote:
If you don't like the result, advise them. If you still don't like it,
fire them and find somebody else. But the "management by central
committee" approach has not really worked to date, so why should a ver
On 4 Oct 2010, at 18:14, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-10-03 at 12:06 -0700, John Locke wrote:
>> "Hi,
>
>> I hope you will consider this proposal -- we like LedgerSMB and want
>> to see it succeed.
>
> I am not really interested in moving the site but I am certainly
> interested in havi
