On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Adam Thompson wrote:
>
> Any new installation of LSMB would, presumably, also occur on a new OS.
> Upgrades are a different problem, of course. The two most conservative
> OSes/distros are generally Debian and Red Hat. Red Hat (and CentOS, SL,
> etc.) defaults t
> LedgerSMB 1.3 officially was written with the idea that it would require
> PostgreSQL 8.1 or higher. 8.1 is effectively end-of-lifed in the sense
> that
> new updates, including security updates, are no longer available from
> the project web site. Some vendors (such as Red Hat) continue to su
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Chris Bennett
wrote:
> OpenBSD is already at 9.0.4 and is working on PostgrSQL 9.1 right now.
> I am all for working on 9+ compatibility
>
We are committed to supporting 9.x. The question is what is the
minimum version we say we support, knowing it may work on eve
OpenBSD is already at 9.0.4 and is working on PostgrSQL 9.1 right now.
I am all for working on 9+ compatibility
Chris Bennett
--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experie
Hi all;
LedgerSMB 1.3 officially was written with the idea that it would
require PostgreSQL 8.1 or higher. 8.1 is effectively end-of-lifed in
the sense that new updates, including security updates, are no longer
available from the project web site. Some vendors (such as Red Hat)
continue to supp
While working on bug 3315195, I need to know how to determine which
parameters a script supports and what effect they have: I've got a
solution for the given script, but I have no idea if it's a correct
solution: I'd like to be stricter that applying the rule "It appears
to work..."
Bye,
Erik.
