Chris writes:
> The relicensing debate is something which is surprisingly complex. My
> view (after discussing this with Richard Fontana from the software
> freedom law center a couple years ago) is that the BSD license does
> not allow attaching restrictions to unmodified BSD-licensed code.
If i
> "Chris" == Chris Travers writes:
>>> "Chris" == Chris Travers writes:
>> Chris> So, suppose we do this. What would it mean for
>> contribution?
>>
>> Chris> If you are a current developer, would you be more or
>> less Chris> likely to contribute in th
On 16. des. 2011 11:12, Chris Travers wrote:
> Originally the entity.name was supposed to be a sort of canonical name.
>
> We should probably, in 1.4, drop company.legal_name. For persons, we
> should keep the canonical name approach though and expose it to the
> UI.
The canonical name idea is us
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 4:28 PM, John Locke wrote:
> Personally I prefer GPLv2 over GPLv3. I'm somewhat agnostic about GPL vs
> BSD -- I do like GPL v2 a lot, and like its mechanism for protecting end
> customers -- but I also work on some BSD-licensed projects and have no
> qualms about a license
