Hi all,
Currently, languages are a list where each language has a description. I
interpret that description as a "translation" of the language code to the
main language of the application. However, since every user can select his
or her own language, I think we should provide the functionality to
Hi Chris,
One of the issues which can limit LedgerSMB long-term is the question of
> areas of the software which may require periodic, locale-specific
> maintenance. These include areas like payroll reporting and revenue
> reporting to relevant tax authorities. The difficulty here is that
> typi
Hi Chris,
> I am thinking we should do RC1/code freeze on Monday and aim for a full
>>> release on Wednesday if no further problems are found.
>>>
>>> Any objection to this?
>>>
>>
>> As we discussed through gTalk, I'll be doing testing of the new foreign
>> currency code as well as the changes t
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:31:12PM +0100, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> I'm sure you know about
> https://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=ledger-smb-devel as
> well, which doesn't thread either.
Actually it does thread albeit perhaps not in the most elegant fashion.
But see for example
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:31:12PM +0100, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> Thanks for pointing it out! The archive you mention does not seem to thread
> responses -- at least, not at the blink of an eye (just scanned the site).
> The value I hope to be adding is exactly that: threaded mails, meaning
> quest
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 05:57:44PM -0800, Chris Travers wrote:
> Hi all;
>
> One of the issues which can limit LedgerSMB long-term is the question of
> areas of the software which may require periodic, locale-specific
> maintenance. These include areas like payroll reporting and revenue
> reporti
Hi Steven,
If I go to Add Employee, there is a dropdown for Manager. The dropdown is
> empty and I can't seem to find anywhere in the software where I can specify
> Manager or a list of Managers. Am I missing something or did I stumble
> across a bug? If the latter, I will go ahead and submit a
Hi Chris,
PostgreSQL 8.2 has reached it's official end of life, meaning that now 8.4
> should, I think, be the minimum version we should be targetting for any and
> all new development (including add-ons). There are a number of cases where
> performance is currently limited by us trying to suppor
