Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Proposed feature request (indefinite version): LaTeX document classes

2012-11-21 Thread Michael Richardson
> "Chris" == Chris Travers writes: Chris> It would mean that most of the template logic would be broken Chris> off into Chris> blocks that could be used outside of LedgerSMB, for other Chris> invoices on other okay, I like it. So rather than processing a template, and runni

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Proposed feature request (indefinite version): LaTeX document classes

2012-11-21 Thread Chris Travers
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Michael Richardson wrote: > > > "Chris" == Chris Travers writes: > Chris> I am wondering what folks think about moving from LaTeX > Chris> templates per se to LaTeX document classes and packages, with > Chris> a lot less micromanagement of layout i

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Proposed feature request (indefinite version): LaTeX document classes

2012-11-21 Thread Michael Richardson
> "Chris" == Chris Travers writes: Chris> I am wondering what folks think about moving from LaTeX Chris> templates per se to LaTeX document classes and packages, with Chris> a lot less micromanagement of layout in the template itself. Chris> The idea is that we could provide a

[Ledger-smb-devel] LedgerSMB 1.3.24 released

2012-11-21 Thread Chris Travers
Hi all; The LedgerSMB development team is proud to release 1.3.24. This release contains a fairly large number of polishing bug-fixes, but also important Plack-related fixes for folks wanting to use LedgerSMB in FCGI and PSGI environments. These fixes ensure that LedgerSMB can be run caching som