Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Proposal for 1.5: Move LedgerSMB to Dancer

2014-09-06 Thread Chris Travers
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Lyle wrote: > I'm very much for moving to a framework and Plack. It makes it much easier > for new developers to understand and contribute to the code. Taking > advantage or persistence with FastCGI or mod_perl through Plack would speed > LedgerSMB up a great deal.

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Proposal for 1.5: Move LedgerSMB to Dancer

2014-09-06 Thread Lyle
I'm very much for moving to a framework and Plack. It makes it much easier for new developers to understand and contribute to the code. Taking advantage or persistence with FastCGI or mod_perl through Plack would speed LedgerSMB up a great deal. I'm not sure how prone the existing code is to me

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Proposal for infrastructure (feedback requested)

2014-09-06 Thread RJ Clay
On 09/05/2014 07:07 AM, Chris Travers wrote: > If you log in to travisci with your github account and set it up on your > own repo you will get emails. I'll be looking into doing that in the next week or so... > > For the main repositories, the information will be posted to the changelogs > and

[Ledger-smb-devel] Travis-CI now enabled on our main repositories

2014-09-06 Thread Chris Travers
Hi everyone; I have enabled Travis-CI on our main repositories. Tests are now passing on all branches. Test coverage is not great but we started from 0 and most of the old code is not testable. I expect the coverage to go up significantly over the 1.5 development period. -- Best Wishes, Chris