Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] LedgerSMB Scalability Bottleneck-- proposal

2007-12-12 Thread Jeff Gerritsen
d there be benefit to using modPerl? Thanks, Jeff Gerritsen On Tuesday 11 December 2007 22:51:36 Chris Travers wrote: > One of the issues that LedgerSMB can run into in larger environments is > that large processes can run into client timeout issues, especially when > large amounts of data

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] The current thinking on the next LedgerSMB architecture.

2007-05-08 Thread Jeff Gerritsen
Chris, Looks good at this end. Put it up on the website AFAIC. Jeff Gerritsen On Monday 07 May 2007 10:10:57 Chris Travers wrote: > Hi all; > > This is an attempt to summarize for the record our current architectural > approach. If there are no concerns, comments, are clarificatio

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Light manufacturing moduels....

2007-01-30 Thread Jeff Gerritsen
Charley, Sounds good to me at this point. I'll look into setting up a sourceforge project when the design document has something substantial in it. Jeff On Tuesday 30 January 2007 21:02, Charley Tiggs wrote: > We can start with Sourceforge for sure and then, if the core developers > of LSMB thi

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Light manufacturing moduels....

2007-01-30 Thread Jeff Gerritsen
Josh, A couple of reasons. MRP requests comes up once and a while on the SL list and many small businesses don't want to be overwhelmed by an ERP system. Secondly I have around 11 years of background in MRP - I felt an MRP module would round out LSMB quite well. Payroll has always been one of

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Light manufacturing moduels....

2007-01-29 Thread Jeff Gerritsen
Thanks for your input Darald, I'll keep the list informed of developments. I'm working on a detailed design document and planning on posting more detail later this week. Hopefully the document will give the specific detail your seeking. If it doesn't feel free to let me know any additional de

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Light manufacturing moduels....

2007-01-29 Thread Jeff Gerritsen
My comments below. Jeff On Saturday 27 January 2007 11:10, Chris Travers wrote: > As I think about it, I do have at least one customer that might be > interested in some of this down the road. They currently use > SQL-Ledger 2.4 in a limited point of sale capacity, and we are trying > to move th

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Light manufacturing moduels....

2007-01-29 Thread Jeff Gerritsen
Charley, Thanks for the input. I've found some manufacturing documentation published on the web and I'm sifting through the material to develop commonalities to be used in developing a design plan or design document for review. I'm thinking about creating a sourceforge project to post the inf

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Light manufacturing moduels....

2007-01-26 Thread Jeff Gerritsen
Charley, Thanks - sounds great and don't worry about Perl skills, afterall I have about 20 years with RPG on the IBM midrange platform System 3 - 32 - 34 - 36 and AS/400. My main goal coding Perl is easily readable and maintainable code separated out into multiple layers - much like MVC structu

[Ledger-smb-devel] Light manufacturing moduels....

2007-01-25 Thread Jeff Gerritsen
27;s - Production schedules - Inventory updates - GL - Etc. This is just some initial ramblings and thoughts. Would anyone out there be interested in sharing ideas and possibly helping out? Jeff Gerritsen -

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] future of LedgerSMB

2007-01-22 Thread Jeff Gerritsen
ize user needs and let them be the "basic" drivers in a discussion on the future of LSMB. Jeff Gerritsen On Monday 22 January 2007 08:16, Chris Travers wrote: > Every language has the possibility of running into cross-platform > issues on some level. I have found, for example. t

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Adding extra custom reports

2006-11-07 Thread Jeff Gerritsen
ypes (and the fact that one cannot add to > these on the fly). Chris what templating system are you folks planning on using? May I suggest template toolkit? > > My own preference is to have a three tier structure with strict > separation in logic betwe