Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Moving the LedgerSMB.org website

2012-06-29 Thread Pete Houston
I've just logged in to the new site using the keyed link which was sent to me via email. It worked OK and I have reset my password now, but there were two warnings highlighted when getting to the page to set my password and other settings. The screenshot is at http://www.openstrike.co.uk/downloads/

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Moving the LedgerSMB.org website

2012-06-26 Thread Pete Houston
I agree with and support all of Nigel's comments and I too would be happy to help with the content cleaning. When your current hosting provider becomes unresponsive that's usually a good indicator that it's time to move elsewhere (even for volunteer hosting). Well done for taking the initiative on

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] New: real time web archive for LedgerSMB mailing lists

2012-02-11 Thread Pete Houston
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:31:12PM +0100, Erik Huelsmann wrote: > I'm sure you know about > https://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=ledger-smb-devel as > well, which doesn't thread either. Actually it does thread albeit perhaps not in the most elegant fashion. But see for example

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Multicurrency issue, concerns, and proposed longer-term direction.

2011-12-30 Thread Pete Houston
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 04:41:47PM -0800, Chris Travers wrote: > My recommendation at present is to do as follows: > > 1) Add a user-configurable threshold setting (and make it default to > 0.005) for paid in full payments. > 2) Either accept there could be a few cents of drift in AR/AP or > cre

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] The Great Licensing Discussion

2011-12-20 Thread Pete Houston
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:03:43AM -0600, John Hasler wrote: > I'm not a current contributor but as user and potential contributor I'd > prefer to see the project stay with GPLv2 and away from GPLv3. BSD is > ok but I prefer GPLv2 (or LGPL, or GPLv2 with stated exceptions). IMHO > GPLv3 is overre

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Web Services API: URL naming proposal

2011-11-18 Thread Pete Houston
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 04:10:59PM +0100, Håvard Sørli wrote: > On 18. nov. 2011 14:52, Chris Travers wrote: > > Figure i will wade in here. Hopefully others will follow. > > On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Erik Huelsmann wrote: > > > i don;t think that would be a problem. I don't like store t

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Proposed financial schema for financial info

2011-10-07 Thread Pete Houston
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 01:22:56PM -0700, Chris Travers wrote: > On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Erik Huelsmann wrote: > > One of my customers requires me to use *their* PO number to be on the > > invoice. They use it to link the digital and physical information > > flows: the physical invoice nev

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Proposed financial schema for financial info

2011-10-06 Thread Pete Houston
Tom, It's just text. Open it in a pager or editor and you'll be fine. Pete On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 11:42:43AM -0400, Thomas Bullock wrote: > Chris, > > When clicking on new_schema.sql Paradox opens and give me this error: Token > not found. Line Number: 1 Token: db > > There was no data to

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] LedgerSMB 1.3.0 RC3 announced

2011-09-26 Thread Pete Houston
Hi Chris, On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:22:32AM -0700, Chris Travers wrote: > The other sigs (for the rpms) check out on my system, but that one sig > fails for some reason even though it was one I created with that key. > > It is good to know someone's checking though. :-) I always check! ;-) The

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] LedgerSMB 1.3.0 RC3 announced

2011-09-26 Thread Pete Houston
Hi Chris, I've just grabbed the source tarball, but the signature fails. Here are the md5s of the two files which I've downloaded from sourceforge.net: 18fca1d435a5ab1cfd0a9381ff0d584f ledgersmb-1.3.0_rc3.tar.gz d06031c906bea9b48813521e58b8d126 ledgersmb-1.3.0_rc3.tar.gz.asc When trying to ver

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] RC2 and perl modules

2011-09-23 Thread Pete Houston
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 08:54:44AM -0700, Chris Travers wrote: > > The problem I had was when I had installed RC2 on a stock > > Centos 6 installation (which has perl 5.10.1) it did not have > > Time::HiRes originally installed, so the module had to be added later > > via yum. Erik's point is that

[Ledger-smb-devel] RC2 and perl modules

2011-09-23 Thread Pete Houston
Hello, I raised a bug against RC2 here: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3412267&group_id=175965&atid=875350 Erik closed this bug off and asked for discussion on this list, so here I am! The problem I had was when I had installed RC2 on a stock Centos 6 installation (which has p