On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 11:32 -0800, Chris Travers wrote:
...
> On the summary report, I have less test data on that (and
> unfortunately anything that is still on pseudo-SL code is impossible
> to automatically test...) These issues sound like they may include:
>
> 1) Join projection issues
> and/
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Ian Goodacre wrote:
> Sorry for being so vague. Yes, CVS Trunk.
>
> >From the menu I am navigating through AR, Reports and Outstanding. I am
> not setting any search fields but selecting either summary or detail
> report. I am working with a test database containi
Sorry for being so vague. Yes, CVS Trunk.
>From the menu I am navigating through AR, Reports and Outstanding. I am
not setting any search fields but selecting either summary or detail
report. I am working with a test database containing only two invoices:
one paid in full and the other with a coup
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Ian Goodacre wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible that there are many errors in LedgerSMB/AA.pm affecting
> the AR reports of outstanding invoices in a recent checkout from CVS?
I assume you are talking about svn trunk here?
I haven't checked the AR outstanding report
Hi,
Is it possible that there are many errors in LedgerSMB/AA.pm affecting
the AR reports of outstanding invoices in a recent checkout from CVS?
The detail report indicates the amount paid incorrectly for outstanding
invoices and the summary report indicates the count of invoices
summarized (I as
