Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Another question re: 2.0

2010-03-18 Thread Ian Goodacre
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 15:06 -0500, Adam Thompson wrote: > > From: Ian Goodacre [mailto:ian.gooda...@xtra.co.nz] > > > > Is there a problem with current distribution methods? > > Yes. ... Good points, well said and nothing I disagree with. Whatever happens, I hope it will be no harder to install

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Another question re: 2.0

2010-03-17 Thread Adam Thompson
> I don't see the tarballs as going away either. Well, no. But CPAN is also a distribution mechanism for tarballs; from what I've seen (granted, I've never written a CPAN module) it looks like you can either target CPAN primarily and spin off tarballs from that, or structure your project so it

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Another question re: 2.0

2010-03-17 Thread Chris Travers
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Adam Thompson wrote: >> From: Ian Goodacre [mailto:ian.gooda...@xtra.co.nz] >> >> Is there a problem with current distribution methods? > > Yes. > > Somewhere north of 80% of potential users will not install software if it > isn't available in either their distrib

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Another question re: 2.0

2010-03-17 Thread Adam Thompson
> From: Ian Goodacre [mailto:ian.gooda...@xtra.co.nz] > > Is there a problem with current distribution methods? Yes. Somewhere north of 80% of potential users will not install software if it isn't available in either their distribution's repository (ports tree, apt/yum/that-thing-SLES-uses, por

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Another question re: 2.0

2010-03-17 Thread Ian Goodacre
On Sun, 2010-03-07 at 12:27 -0800, Chris Travers wrote: > What do folks think about moving to CPAN as a distribution mechanism > for 2.0 and perhaps only seeing Sourceforge as for bundle > distributions? I think CPAN works very well for distribution of Perl modules to be installed to the standard

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Another question re: 2.0

2010-03-08 Thread Adam Thompson
Michael Richardson wrote: >> "Adam" == Adam Thompson writes: > Adam> YES Pretty much every distro has ready-made tools for > Adam> turning CPAN distributions into native packages, this might > Adam> eliminate a lot of the app packaging burden. -Adam > > Really? What are

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Another question re: 2.0

2010-03-07 Thread Adam Thompson
LedgerSMB Subject: [Ledger-smb-devel] Another question re: 2.0 Sent: Mar 7, 2010 14:27 What do folks think about moving to CPAN as a distribution mechanism for 2.0 and perhaps only seeing Sourceforge as for bundle distributions? Best Wishes, Chris Travers

[Ledger-smb-devel] Another question re: 2.0

2010-03-07 Thread Chris Travers
What do folks think about moving to CPAN as a distribution mechanism for 2.0 and perhaps only seeing Sourceforge as for bundle distributions? Best Wishes, Chris Travers -- Download IntelĀ® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new