On 29/07/2010 17:00, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Hello,
>
> What features would you like to see in 2.0?
>
> The number one feature for me is:
>
"Better" FX currency handling...
This is a truly big and difficult subject, so "better" would be a
starting point.
Major issues:
- Using two exchange r
SMB"
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 3:43:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Features you would like to see in 2.0
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010, David A. Bandel wrote:
> A way to include line items for a client (charges) that accumulate and
> are posted as one invoice at the end of
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010, David A. Bandel wrote:
> A way to include line items for a client (charges) that accumulate and
> are posted as one invoice at the end of the month.
>
> Example:
> on 3 Aug: billed Example Corp for a new VPN
> on 7 Aug: billed Example Corp for modifications in their PBX
> on 1
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 08:35 -0500, David A. Bandel wrote:
> This would also be useful for attorneys who charge by the hour and may
> bill a client for several hours on various days, but only want to give
> them one monthly statement.
What you want is a billing module. That you can group billables
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:00, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Hello,
>
> What features would you like to see in 2.0?
>
> The number one feature for me is:
>
A way to include line items for a client (charges) that accumulate and
are posted as one invoice at the end of the month.
Example:
on 3 Aug: bill
Dear Ed,
Thank you very much for your email, it was really useful for me :)
It would be really nice to have a "plugin library" for common "problems"
like exports, imports. Probably imports are more important than exports
(depends on users).
Finally I figured out how to get a fresh currency from
Hi
* Automaticly refresh currency exchange rate from official web services
(configurable somehow: when, from, which with multiple currencies).
Example: In Hungary we must use www.mnb.hu, others should use anything else.
Exchange rate should be like this: HUF/USD: 216,99 (Configurable)
This se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "Jeff" == Jeff Kowalczyk writes:
>> What features would you like to see in 2.0?
Jeff> A Perl http mini server suitable for testing and debugging the
Jeff> code during development and customization, prior to production
Jeff> dep
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 4:21 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
> If invoices are going to be non-editable, then I'd like to see
> a "Clone" button for posted invoices.
>
> This will clone all the information into a new invoice (but not post it).
> Otherwise, correcting errors will be very tedious as every
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, David F. Skoll wrote:
> If invoices are going to be non-editable, then I'd like to see
> a "Clone" button for posted invoices.
>
> This will clone all the information into a new invoice (but not post it).
> Otherwise, correcting errors will be very tedious as everything will
>
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 07:21:34 -0400, "David F. Skoll"
wrote:
> If invoices are going to be non-editable, then I'd like to see
> a "Clone" button for posted invoices.
That's a pretty good idea.
JD
--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake(at)jabber(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Consulting, Development, Support, T
If invoices are going to be non-editable, then I'd like to see
a "Clone" button for posted invoices.
This will clone all the information into a new invoice (but not post it).
Otherwise, correcting errors will be very tedious as everything will
have to be re-entered.
Regards,
David.
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> In 1.3 (Trunk) we already have this:
I'll have a look. My general aversion to the black-holeish nature of 1.3
has prevented me from noticing thus far.
Luke
--
The Palm PDK
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 00:13 -0400, Luke wrote:
> If there is a notes table:
>
> noteID (sequence)
> invoiceID
> type (enum: original, internal, additional)
> added (timestamp)
> note
>
> Originals can be created (unique per invoice) and viewed.
> Internals can be created and viewed.
> Additional
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 21:53 -0500, John Hasler wrote:
>> Joshua D. Drake writes:
>>> I would go for permanent invoices AND non-editable invoices (notes not
>>> included).
>>
>> Notes can be important and need to be preserved. How about permitting
>> n
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 21:53 -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake writes:
> > I would go for permanent invoices AND non-editable invoices (notes not
> > included).
>
> Notes can be important and need to be preserved. How about permitting
> notes to be added but not altered?
Thus the (notes
Joshua D. Drake writes:
> I would go for permanent invoices AND non-editable invoices (notes not
> included).
Notes can be important and need to be preserved. How about permitting
notes to be added but not altered?
> The proper acct workflow is that if an invoice has a mistake and has
> been pos
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, David F. Skoll wrote:
> I like to be able to edit invoices. People are human and sometimes
> make mistakes that don't get noticed until the invoice is printed.
> But I guess if this violates accounting practices, I can live with
> canceling the invoice and making a new one.
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 19:57 -0400, David F. Skoll wrote:
> Luke wrote:
>
> > Oh, and I would like to see invoices that don't change after the fact,
>
> +1 on this.
>
> > The other thing on invoices is editable notes.
>
> And on this.
>
> It's worse than ironic that the default work flow does
Luke wrote:
> Oh, and I would like to see invoices that don't change after the fact,
+1 on this.
> The other thing on invoices is editable notes.
And on this.
It's worse than ironic that the default work flow does not let you edit
non-sensitive parts of invoices, but silently changes the tota
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> What features would you like to see in 2.0?
Oh, and I would like to see invoices that don't change after the fact,
to-wit:
I have an invoice for a non-taxable customer. That customer was later
changed to be taxable.
The invoice still shows up corr
Joshua D. Drake writes:
> What features would you like to see in 2.0?
A Perl http mini server suitable for testing and debugging the code during
development and customization, prior to production deployment.
Jeff
--
Th
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> What features would you like to see in 2.0?
One that I would actually be willing to write (I think), depending upon
the interface, is a context help system.
Another thing that has been lacking for a long time, is flexibility in
action chains. Ther
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, David F. Skoll wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>> What features would you like to see in 2.0?
>
>> The number one feature for me is:
>
>> # Updated and Modernized interface
-1.:) I do see the value of that, but as a primary development goal,
there are too many other thin
o1bigtenor writes:
> I had filed a request to have at least 7 digits available for
>accounts. That should enable a few sub-accounts!
Unfortunately it takes more than that.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
Hi,
My wish list, besides the mentioned before and without deep knowledge of
SMB:
* Automaticly refresh currency exchange rate from official web services
(configurable somehow: when, from, which with multiple currencies).
Example: In Hungary we must use www.mnb.hu, others should use anything els
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:44 AM, o1bigtenor wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:44 AM, John Hasler wrote:
>
>> Joshua D. Drake writes:
>> > What features would you like to see in 2.0?
>>
>> Subaccounts.
>>
>
> I had filed a request to have at least 7 digits available for accounts.
> That s
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:44 AM, John Hasler wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake writes:
> > What features would you like to see in 2.0?
>
> Subaccounts.
>
I had filed a request to have at least 7 digits available for accounts.
That should enable a few sub-accounts!
I would like this too very very much!
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Hello,
>
> What features would you like to see in 2.0?
>
> The number one feature for me is:
>
Redesign the database. No sense building on sand.
Gerald.
--
The
Joshua D. Drake writes:
> What features would you like to see in 2.0?
Subaccounts.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
--
The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the
Plug-In Development Ki
--Original Message-
> From: Joshua D. Drake [mailto:j...@commandprompt.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 11:00
> To: ledger-smb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Ledger-smb-devel] Features you would like to see in 2.0
>
> Hello,
>
> What features would you like to see in
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> What features would you like to see in 2.0?
> The number one feature for me is:
> # Updated and Modernized interface
I don't care at all about that :) Here's what I'd like to see:
o A proper API, preferably REST-based.
o A trigger mechanism that can invoke actions (
Hello,
What features would you like to see in 2.0?
The number one feature for me is:
# Updated and Modernized interface
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Eng
33 matches
Mail list logo
