Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Looking beyond 1.3: Kernalization andrequirements proposals.

2010-03-06 Thread Chris Travers
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Adam Thompson wrote: > One big caveat: the use of anything other than ActivePerl on Windows. > There's no deep, unavoidable reason that Perl+IIS can't be used under Windows > - the mod_rewrite functionality can be done in other, almost as easy, ways. The big issu

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Looking beyond 1.3: Kernalization andrequirements proposals.

2010-03-06 Thread Luke
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Adam Thompson wrote: > One big caveat: the use of anything other than ActivePerl on Windows. > There's no deep, unavoidable reason that Perl+IIS can't be used under What about authentication? My understanding was that Apache is intimately involved in the authentication proce

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Looking beyond 1.3: Kernalization andrequirements proposals.

2010-03-06 Thread Adam Thompson
One big caveat: the use of anything other than ActivePerl on Windows. There's no deep, unavoidable reason that Perl+IIS can't be used under Windows - the mod_rewrite functionality can be done in other, almost as easy, ways. For that matter, if 2.0 is a major rewrite, I'm of the opinion it should