Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Proposal for infrastructure (feedback requested)

2014-09-06 Thread RJ Clay
On 09/05/2014 07:07 AM, Chris Travers wrote: > If you log in to travisci with your github account and set it up on your > own repo you will get emails. I'll be looking into doing that in the next week or so... > > For the main repositories, the information will be posted to the changelogs > and

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Proposal for infrastructure (feedback requested)

2014-09-05 Thread John Locke
+1 I'm using Jenkins hooked up to our internal gitolite server for dev work for similar purposes, and it has greatly improved our release process -- we're now enforcing a bunch of policies when rolling release branches and have already caught a bunch of breakages before they reached productio

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Proposal for infrastructure (feedback requested)

2014-09-05 Thread Chris Travers
If you log in to travisci with your github account and set it up on your own repo you will get emails. For the main repositories, the information will be posted to the changelogs and if you look under the branch listing, you can see the status on each branch. On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 3:07 AM, Erik

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Proposal for infrastructure (feedback requested)

2014-09-05 Thread Erik Huelsmann
Sounds good. How will we know about the results? Will we be receiving e-mails? Regards, Erik. On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Chris Travers wrote: > I will try to set up travisci for LedgerSMB this weekend or early next > week. I will have it run a full set of tests on each branch when a co

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Proposal for infrastructure (feedback requested)

2014-09-05 Thread Chris Travers
I will try to set up travisci for LedgerSMB this weekend or early next week. I will have it run a full set of tests on each branch when a commit occurs. On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 2:54 AM, Erik Huelsmann wrote: > Hi Chris, > > Looks like a great service. It definitely sounds like we can use this f

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Proposal for infrastructure (feedback requested)

2014-09-05 Thread Erik Huelsmann
Hi Chris, Looks like a great service. It definitely sounds like we can use this for the 1.3 and 1.4 branches to prevent breakage. To those who don't know about the scope of our testing, you told me that these are the types of tests that we have currently in place: - number formatting - number

[Ledger-smb-devel] Proposal for infrastructure (feedback requested)

2014-09-04 Thread Chris Travers
Hi; For one of my consulting clients, I have been running travis-CI against some Perl projects. It's a nice service which gives us test cases run on every commit. I am considering setting it up for our Github repositories (the PGObject modules as well). Does anyone have any feedback? Are there