Hi all,
Due to trying to write a comprehensive list of instructions people should
run to install LedgerSMB 1.5, I now have a number of questions:
1. Our Makefile.PL lists CGI::Emulate::PSGI as a dependency under the
Starman server. It's my perception though that in order to run 1.5, you
need Pla
Hi,
> I have some perl scripts I wrote 4 or 5 years ago to do imports of data
> from MT4 into LedgerSMB. At the time there was essentially no usable
> perl-level API to interact with the LedgerSMB database, so I simply wrote
> my own.
>
> Now we have LedgerSMB 1.4, and I see there are some sig
Hi,
I have some perl scripts I wrote 4 or 5 years ago to do imports of data
from MT4 into LedgerSMB. At the time there was essentially no usable
perl-level API to interact with the LedgerSMB database, so I simply wrote
my own.
Now we have LedgerSMB 1.4, and I see there are some significant change
Certainly, many businesses have accounts in different currencies. Just
think of your PayPal account.
Lyle
On 20/09/2014 20:26, Pongrácz István wrote:
Hi Chris,
I think it would be handy. Both the cash flow support and foreign
currency..
Cheers,
IStván
eredeti üzenet--
Hi Chris,
I think it would be handy. Both the cash flow support and foreign currency..
Cheers,
IStván
eredeti üzenet-
Feladó: "Chris Travers" chris.trav...@gmail.com
Címzett: "Development discussion for LedgerSMB"
ledger-smb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Dátu
In order to support a statement of cash flows I will need to extend the
current chat of accounts structure to specify operational vs
non-operational changes in cash standing.
In addition, do we want to have a setting on the account which will flag it
is floating in another currency? It seems to m
Ok, I am about to go to sleep. I have to be up for an onsite meeting with
a customer first thing in the morning so it may be a little while before I
can respond.
Once you have this information and it looks reasonably complete (you could
have several packages installed) then you can start by backi
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 7:20 AM, o1bigtenor wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Chris Travers wrote:
>
>> Hi Darald;
>>
>> we may have to do without logical backups and plan to restore file-level
>> backups. Please run the following commands and report the results:
>>
>> dpkg -l postgr
sorry that should be:
dpkg-query -l postgresql*| grep ^ii
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Chris Travers wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 7:20 AM, o1bigtenor wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Chris Travers wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Darald;
>>>
>>> we may have to do without logic
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Chris Travers wrote:
> Hi Darald;
>
> we may have to do without logical backups and plan to restore file-level
> backups. Please run the following commands and report the results:
>
> dpkg -l postgresql*
>
> psql -V
>
> first results in over a page of files includi
Hi Darald;
we may have to do without logical backups and plan to restore file-level
backups. Please run the following commands and report the results:
dpkg -l postgresql*
psql -V
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:56 AM, o1bigtenor wrote:
>
>
> if you type: psql -p 5433
>>
>> what do you get?
>>
>>
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Chris Travers wrote:
>
> if you type: psql -p 5433
>
> what do you get?
>
> You might have multiple Pg instances installed.
>
Does it make a difference if I have /var/lib/postgresql rather than
/var/lib/psql?
if you type: psql -p 5433
>
> what do you get?
>
> You might have multiple Pg instances installed.
>
If only! Rather:
psql: could not connect to the server: No such file or directory
please? (accompanied by whimpers!)
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:40 AM, o1bigtenor wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Chris Travers wrote:
>
>>
snip
>
> Sorry, I got the sudo command wrong. Confused sudo and su.
>>
>> sudo -u postgres pg_dumpall > /tmp/mypgbackup.sql
>> cp /tmp/mypgbackup /home/m
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Chris Travers wrote:
>
>>> snip
Sorry, I got the sudo command wrong. Confused sudo and su.
>
> sudo -u postgres pg_dumpall > /tmp/mypgbackup.sql
> cp /tmp/mypgbackup /home/myuser/
>
the response to the sudo . . .is:
>>>
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:09 AM, o1bigtenor wrote:
>
> I counted - - - I have over 12 pages of commands (written out) that I
> have worked through in this odyssey to date!
>
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Chris Travers wrote:
>
>>
>> snip
>>>
>>> Sorry, I got the sudo command wrong. Confused
I counted - - - I have over 12 pages of commands (written out) that I have
worked through in this odyssey to date!
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Chris Travers wrote:
>
> snip
>>
>> Sorry, I got the sudo command wrong. Confused sudo and su.
>>>
>>> sudo -u postgres pg_dumpall > /tmp/mypgback
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:25 AM, o1bigtenor wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Chris Travers wrote:
>
> snip
>
> Sorry, I got the sudo command wrong. Confused sudo and su.
>>
>> sudo -u postgres pg_dumpall > /tmp/mypgbackup.sql
>> cp /tmp/mypgbackup /home/myuser/
>>
>
> the response
Hi Darald,
You mention that your main problem is an xorg / nvidia issue.
What flavor and version of linux are you running (sorry if I missed that
earlier)
In many cases this type of issue is caused when a kernel update occurs.
A simple initial fix is to backup your xorg.conf file, then delete
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Chris Travers wrote:
snip
Sorry, I got the sudo command wrong. Confused sudo and su.
>
> sudo -u postgres pg_dumpall > /tmp/mypgbackup.sql
> cp /tmp/mypgbackup /home/myuser/
>
the response to the sudo . . .is:
pgdumpall: could not connect to database "
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:03 PM, o1bigtenor wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Chris Travers wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:43 AM, o1bigtenor wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Chris Travers
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 a
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Chris Travers wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:43 AM, o1bigtenor wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Chris Travers
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:48 PM, o1bigtenor wrote:
>>>
Greetings
I wasn't sure we
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:43 AM, o1bigtenor wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Chris Travers wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:48 PM, o1bigtenor wrote:
>>
>>> Greetings
>>>
>>> I wasn't sure wether to ask these questions here or in the users list -
>>> - - so if its the
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Chris Travers wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:48 PM, o1bigtenor wrote:
>
>> Greetings
>>
>> I wasn't sure wether to ask these questions here or in the users list - -
>> - so if its the wrong place - - - sorry.
>>
>> I've managed to really borc my main syst
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:48 PM, o1bigtenor wrote:
> Greetings
>
> I wasn't sure wether to ask these questions here or in the users list - -
> - so if its the wrong place - - - sorry.
>
> I've managed to really borc my main system so I am thinking that I would
> just do a reinstall. So I would red
Greetings
I wasn't sure wether to ask these questions here or in the users list - - -
so if its the wrong place - - - sorry.
I've managed to really borc my main system so I am thinking that I would
just do a reinstall. So I would redo the root partition and in the past I
also did the var area as
On 10/12/07, Charley Tiggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris Travers wrote:
> > On 10/12/07, Charley Tiggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Chris Travers wrote:
> >>> On 10/12/07, Charley Tiggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris Travers wrote:
> > On 10/12/07, Charley Tiggs <[EMAIL PROTECT
Chris Travers wrote:
> On 10/12/07, Charley Tiggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Chris Travers wrote:
>>> On 10/12/07, Charley Tiggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chris Travers wrote:
> On 10/12/07, Charley Tiggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Yes, the process happened prior to the 1.2.8 ho
On 10/12/07, Charley Tiggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris Travers wrote:
> > On 10/12/07, Charley Tiggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Chris Travers wrote:
> >>> On 10/12/07, Charley Tiggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, the process happened prior to the 1.2.8 hotfix. The attempt to
>
Chris Travers wrote:
> On 10/12/07, Charley Tiggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Chris Travers wrote:
>>> On 10/12/07, Charley Tiggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, the process happened prior to the 1.2.8 hotfix. The attempt to
reverse the transaction happened after.
>>> THis is probably
On 10/12/07, Charley Tiggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris Travers wrote:
> > On 10/12/07, Charley Tiggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Yes, the process happened prior to the 1.2.8 hotfix. The attempt to
> >> reverse the transaction happened after.
> >
> > THis is probably related to the issue
Chris Travers wrote:
> On 10/12/07, Charley Tiggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Yes, the process happened prior to the 1.2.8 hotfix. The attempt to
>> reverse the transaction happened after.
>
> THis is probably related to the issue the hotfix was designed to fix.
>
> If you entered the invoice
On 10/12/07, Charley Tiggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, the process happened prior to the 1.2.8 hotfix. The attempt to
> reverse the transaction happened after.
THis is probably related to the issue the hotfix was designed to fix.
If you entered the invoice for 10 items and sold them, the q
Yes, the process happened prior to the 1.2.8 hotfix. The attempt to
reverse the transaction happened after.
Charley
Chris Travers wrote:
> Did this happen prior to the installation of the 1.2.8 hotfix?
>
> Best Wishes,
> Chris Travers
>
> On 10/12/07, Charley Tiggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did this happen prior to the installation of the 1.2.8 hotfix?
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
On 10/12/07, Charley Tiggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's the scenario:
>
> 1) Purchase order placed for 15 widgets.
>
> 2) Partial delivery made of 10 widgets.
>
> 3) Vendor invoice created based on th
Here's the scenario:
1) Purchase order placed for 15 widgets.
2) Partial delivery made of 10 widgets.
3) Vendor invoice created based on the partial delivery.
4) 10 separate customers place an order for 10 of those widgets.
A look at the entry in the invoice table for this widget from the ven
SL 2.x to LSMB 1.1 should be an easy migration. However, we are
diverging rapidly as you point out. In fact, our 1.2 changelog is
about 50 lines (including a few blank lines and section headers).
LSMB 1.2 will be a harder migration for anybody. 1.3 may be too.
After that, we expect things to sm
I am currently using SQL Ledger internally and for multiple hosted clients. I would love to migrate to LedgerSMB but wonder how you plan to handle this process after multiple development cycles for both products. Right now the code is pretty similar but what about in 6 months when there has been
38 matches
Mail list logo
