Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Site for LedgerSMB Forum

2007-08-23 Thread Jeff Kowalczyk
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:16:20 -0400, Eloi George wrote: > ... forums provide a way to get the more non-technical involved / > interested in the product. ... Ledger-SMB seems to be more targeting the > small to medium business owner that can't afford an IT person and > doesn't have the time or patien

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Site for LedgerSMB Forum

2007-08-23 Thread Chris Travers
Hi; On 8/23/07, Eloi George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ok, I see what you mean. However my assertion was never about what > should be the -main- thrust of communication. That's decided by the > community. I'm just saying that forums provide a way to get the more > non-technical involved

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Site for LedgerSMB Forum

2007-08-23 Thread Eloi George
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > I am disagreeing. The main thrust of communication about all of the > above is mailing lists, not web based forums, with the exception of > maybe Ubuntu. > Ok, I see what you mean. However my assertion was never about what should be the -main- thrust of communication

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Site for LedgerSMB Forum

2007-08-23 Thread Joshua D. Drake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Eloi George wrote: > Hi! > > Sorry for the late response. Forgot to add this mailing list to my > daily ToDos. > I think it's great that it simply turned out to be a case of > miscommunication & that things are moving along again! > > There was

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Site for LedgerSMB Forum

2007-08-23 Thread Eloi George
Hi! Sorry for the late response. Forgot to add this mailing list to my daily ToDos. I think it's great that it simply turned out to be a case of miscommunication & that things are moving along again! There was a confusing reply to my post however... Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> As a matter of

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Site for LedgerSMB Forum

2007-08-10 Thread Joshua D. Drake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chris Bennett wrote: > OK, I will wait to see what you come up with and work within those > guidelines > The site is currently very rough so I need to do some more work before > any links are "officially" given out. > I never intended to keep the

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Site for LedgerSMB Forum

2007-08-10 Thread Chris Bennett
OK, I will wait to see what you come up with and work within those guidelines The site is currently very rough so I need to do some more work before any links are "officially" given out. I never intended to keep the look that the site has now, it was just intended as a quick way to throw up

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Site for LedgerSMB Forum

2007-08-10 Thread Chris Bennett
OK, I will wait to see what you come up with and work within those guidelines The site is currently very rough so I need to do some more work before any links are "officially" given out. I never intended to keep the look that the site has now, it was just intended as a quick way to throw up

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Site for LedgerSMB Forum

2007-08-09 Thread Chris Travers
Just to expand on this-- the other reason for asking people to take credit for infrastructure beyond our control is that it shows people that we *do* have an active community who are involved in the pushing the project forward. It is nice to show that off a little :-) I will be submitting draft g

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Site for LedgerSMB Forum

2007-08-09 Thread Chris Travers
Hi Chris; Sorry for the misunderstandings. I never heard back from you so... maybe everyone is talking past eachother. My appologies too :-) The concerns were just that the web site design and domain name gave the impression that they were a part of our core infrastructure while the core team d

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Site for LedgerSMB Forum

2007-08-09 Thread Chris Bennett
Chris Travers wrote: > Hi; > > I think there are questions as to the utility of forums. I will give > my list of pros/cons here. > > Pros: > There is some question whether our target market will be happier on > forums as we move into more of the Quickbooks Basic market. Maybe. > > Cons: >

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Site for LedgerSMB Forum

2007-08-09 Thread Chris Travers
Hi; I think there are questions as to the utility of forums. I will give my list of pros/cons here. Pros: There is some question whether our target market will be happier on forums as we move into more of the Quickbooks Basic market. Maybe. Cons: Mailing lists allow for generally better co

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Site for LedgerSMB Forum

2007-08-09 Thread Joshua D. Drake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ed W wrote: > Hi ion is frequently better than it is on most > mailing list archives). I guess it's just like the netnews guys who > moan that it's a much better system than email, and yet how many > projects reach for a newsgroup before they setup

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Site for LedgerSMB Forum

2007-08-09 Thread Ed W
Hi > I wasn't going to say anything, but now that Josh has I'll chime in too. I > agree with Josh's statement above, and I can add to it. One of my current > clients (a fairly popular distro vendor) actually tried to move to forums > about a year or so ago. The backlash was so bad that they ha

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Site for LedgerSMB Forum

2007-08-09 Thread Christopher Murtagh
On Thursday 09 August 2007 12:27:30 Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > As a matter of fact, I usually require the existence of an open Forum > > before seriously considering any software for use or recommendation. > > To date it has been the perfect litmus test. Since then, I've never > > picked any dead-

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Site for LedgerSMB Forum

2007-08-09 Thread Joshua D. Drake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I completely agree with what you're doing -- as a contributor to other > open-source projects I can attest that mailing lists only benefit > project developers and some technologically-literate users. > Mainstream acce

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Site for LedgerSMB Forum

2007-08-05 Thread eloi
I completely agree with what you're doing -- as a contributor to other open-source projects I can attest that mailing lists only benefit project developers and some technologically-literate users. Mainstream acceptance only comes when there is an active user community. That can't happen o

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Site for LedgerSMB Forum

2007-04-15 Thread Chris Travers
On 4/15/07, Chris Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> If you want to advertise your business as sponsoring it, all the >> better. > > I thought long and hard about that, > but decided that the value of external links was greater than any negative > opinions about it. > I had a hard hard time

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Site for LedgerSMB Forum

2007-04-15 Thread Chris Bennett
"Please state specifically that you are running this for the community as a donation to the larger community as a whole." No Problem! Yes. This forum project is a donation to the community, whole, part or pieces. I will also say that I am offering my services, not my own idea of what is desired

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Site for LedgerSMB Forum

2007-04-15 Thread Chris Travers
Hi; Here is my thinking: If you are going to do something like this, you really want to take credit for this. Please state specifically that you are running this for the community as a donation to the larger community as a whole. If you want to advertise your business as sponsoring it, all the b

[Ledger-smb-devel] Site for LedgerSMB Forum

2007-04-14 Thread Chris Bennett
Hi, I've been lurking for a while watching LSMB develop, very pleased with what I see. There were posts about a need for a forum but no one stepped up. I think a forum will be a big usability step forward for many users/potential users. I also think a forum will allow some advantages with section