On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Tim Lai wrote:
> Try openswan way back redhat7.3. Can't get it to compile. Is openswan
> easier to implement now? We are always short of time so had to take
> the easier path. Tim
OpenSWAN on RH 7.3? RedHat always made custom kernel modules a bit of
a problem to
I use openswan for about 15 of my clients. As Chris said, it has some
big advantages in that besides linux, mac and windows can connect to it
using native and standards-compliant software built into the os, and it
also supports a configuration where one side of the connection can be a
dynamic addr
Try openswan way back redhat7.3. Can't get it to compile. Is openswan
easier to implement now? We are always short of time so had to take
the easier path. Tim
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 27, 2010, at 9:14 AM, Chris Travers
wrote:
> particularly scalable.
> OpenVPN while fairly scalable was
My two cents here:
When I build a VPN, I prefer to do it using standards-compliant tools.
OpenSSH, while standards-compliant isn't particularly scalable.
OpenVPN while fairly scalable wasn't based on any standards last time
I checked. I usually use OpenS/wan in the past. The nice thing about
Op
Hi Luke,
Luke wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Mar 2010, David Godfrey wrote:
>
>> We Looked at openvpn and other VPN options, but there are limitations,
>
> We?
We as in we here at SBTS and some of our customers.
>
>> including the setup requirements, and issues with dynamic IP's
>
> Which issues are t
