On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 21:50 -0400, Luke wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Oct 2010, Eamonn Hamilton wrote:
>
> > Hmm, the problem was it wouldn't et him post the 1297 invoice, almost as
> > though there was a collision - but no such invoice exists in the
> > database.
>
> What does "wouldn't let him" mean?
>
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010, Eamonn Hamilton wrote:
> His workflow is pretty consistent, but he *may* have emailed the invoice
> before posting. I'll check with him.
Nothing wrong with that, as long as he remembers to post after he emails
it.
Luke
--
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010, Eamonn Hamilton wrote:
> Hmm, the problem was it wouldn't et him post the 1297 invoice, almost as
> though there was a collision - but no such invoice exists in the
> database.
What does "wouldn't let him" mean?
Luke
-
