Chris,
> Many of you may be frustrated at the pace of development of LedgerSMB
> and the fact that 1.3 has not yet been released. Development may
> appear to have slowed. Public discussions become less frequent...
FWIW, this is normal for projects approaching their first Big Release. The
answe
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Adrian Levi wrote:
> Is there a payrole function in the works, what would it cost me to
> have one written?
>
> Watching progress in LSMB with interest.
Well, payroll is a nightmare because of so many national and local
requirements. I have the basics of a datab
On 18 May 2011 06:53, Chris Travers wrote:
> Hi all;
>
> Many of you may be frustrated at the pace of development of LedgerSMB
> and the fact that 1.3 has not yet been released. Development may
> appear to have slowed. Public discussions become less frequent...
I installed and tinkered with LSMB
On Tue, 17 May 2011, ario wrote:
> How about only raising a flag when you press a button that would make
> you leave the transaction window?
Onclick::AnnoyUser("Unposted, are you sure?");
for every link that appears with an updated but unposted transaction.
> Like in MS Windows (W) bugging the
I haven't considered this much, but this thought just occurred to me...
I was thinking, in regards to your message below, "yeah, at least not with
a web based interface." In a thick interface, you could retain state, and
not *let* the user lose/leave the invoice, until he posts, suspends, or
c
ario wrote:
> I am sure that what you propose would make me very nervous :)
>
> How about only raising a flag when you press a button that would make
> you leave the transaction window?
>
> Like in MS Windows (W) bugging the user (U) with:
> W: Are sure? (press 'NO' or 'Cancel')
> U: 'Yes?'
> W
I'm very happily using LSMB in its current version and state and will be
grateful with any improvement or future version.
Thanks for the great work!
It is a really useful engine, as 'the fat controller' would say :)
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 13:53 -0700, Chris Travers wrote:
> Hi all;
>
> Many of y
I am sure that what you propose would make me very nervous :)
How about only raising a flag when you press a button that would make
you leave the transaction window?
Like in MS Windows (W) bugging the user (U) with:
W: Are sure? (press 'NO' or 'Cancel')
U: 'Yes?'
W: You are about to leave this wi
I also forget to post sometimes because of a different human error.
Regardless of check boxes or different buttons it would still be
possible to forget to post, or forget to check the boxes for that matter.
Perhaps the original screen could have a strong "NOT POSTED" flag which
only disappears aft
On 17/05/2011 21:53, Chris Travers wrote:
> I'd also like to encourage anyone who is interested in contributing to
> start looking heavily at 1.3. This is a place where you can earn a
> name in the CONTRIBUTORS file, or possibly even commit privileges.
I started with the subversion copy, but reve
Hi Hugh,Chris,
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Hugh Esco
wrote:
> My preference would be that print and email buttons be removed from the
> interface, except when viewing a posted invoice, where I'd also like to
> see a reverse transaction button for users with appropriate
> permissions.
Very n
Hi all;
Many of you may be frustrated at the pace of development of LedgerSMB
and the fact that 1.3 has not yet been released. Development may
appear to have slowed. Public discussions become less frequent...
For the last few years, LedgerSMB has achieved significant growth.
Some of that growth
12 matches
Mail list logo
