I started to respond point by point, but I'll just instead say:
+1 on all points.
Luke
On Tue, 17 May 2011, ario wrote:
> Great idea, at least with respect to the Post command.
> For Update I don't consider it very useful, but who am I...
> But, configurability of this option in the Preferences
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 08:51:18AM -0700, Chris Travers wrote:
>
> In cases where there is a change to desired behavior I would agree
> with you. In cases where the change is still in line with
> documentation, I am not sure that's necessary.
>
> Also I don't think it's practical to fully docume
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 7:20 AM, Chris Bennett
wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:16:44AM -0700, Chris Travers wrote:
>>
>> 2) Technical documentation
>> 3) Code documentation
>
> User documentation is fine but coders need to have clear documentation for
> code.
> Changing each items documenta
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:16:44AM -0700, Chris Travers wrote:
>
> 2) Technical documentation
> 3) Code documentation
User documentation is fine but coders need to have clear documentation for code.
Changing each items documentation as it changes needs to be a requirement for
that coder.
No do
