The LedgerSMB Development Team is please to announce the availability
of LedgerSMB 1.3.0 beta 4. This is a beta testing version, not
intended for general release yet. Currently however, all test cases
pass, and this is a good opportunity for people to install the
software and provide needed feedb
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Luke wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Jul 2011, Chris Travers wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Luke
>> wrote:
>>
Additionally considering adding a checkbox to automatically attach an
invoice being emailed or printed.
>>>
>>> Meaning that the file(s) attache
The distribution readmes should also go I think.
Erick has it all in his version, and it is better to have it all in one
place anyway.
We can eventually convert his into an installation manual in HTML, to make
section skipping easy.
Luke
On Sun, 3 Jul 2011, Chris Travers wrote:
> If this is t
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011, Chris Travers wrote:
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Luke wrote:
Additionally considering adding a checkbox to automatically attach an
invoice being emailed or printed.
Meaning that the file(s) attached (one checkbox per file) would be
included with the email/print job?
If this is the doc/README file, maybe we should just move the INSTALL
file there and overwrite? It seems more than a little out of date.
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
--
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure i
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 7:41 AM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> Chris,
>
>
> On Sun, 3 Jul 2011 07:10:42 -0700, Chris Travers wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Philip Rhoades
>> wrote:
>>> Chris,
>>>
>>> I had a quick look at the two previous snapshots and there are still
>>> issues (particularly
Chris,
On Sun, 3 Jul 2011 07:10:42 -0700, Chris Travers wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Philip Rhoades
> wrote:
>> Chris,
>>
>> I had a quick look at the two previous snapshots and there are still
>> issues (particularly wrt RPM based systems) but I have been
>> distracted
>> with mor
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> Chris,
>
> I had a quick look at the two previous snapshots and there are still
> issues (particularly wrt RPM based systems) but I have been distracted
> with more pressing things of late so I will get back to checking the
> latest snapshot
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> Chris,
>
> I had a quick look at the two previous snapshots and there are still
> issues (particularly wrt RPM based systems) but I have been distracted
> with more pressing things of late so I will get back to checking the
> latest snapshot
Hi Philip,
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> Chris,
>
> I had a quick look at the two previous snapshots and there are still
> issues (particularly wrt RPM based systems) but I have been distracted
> with more pressing things of late so I will get back to checking the
> la
Chris,
I had a quick look at the two previous snapshots and there are still
issues (particularly wrt RPM based systems) but I have been distracted
with more pressing things of late so I will get back to checking the
latest snapshot ASAP.
Regards,
Phil.
On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 06:59:50 -0700, Chr
11 matches
Mail list logo
