On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Luke wrote:
> Yes, although potentially non-face-value bonds might fall under this as
> well, short or long term. I shouldn't have included CDs in the list though,
> as they can probably be tracked by conventional means, by just a transaction
> to record the inter
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011, Chris Travers wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Luke wrote:
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Chris Travers wrote:
1) What segments of users are most likely to benefit from this?
Interesting. I'm not sure, actually. Not even sure how you define
segments, but I'll take a stab.
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Luke wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Chris Travers wrote:
>
>> First I think this is a great idea. However I have a few questions:
>
> Thanks.:)
>
>> 1) What segments of users are most likely to benefit from this?
>
> Interesting. I'm not sure, actually. Not even s
At first blush I sort of blew this one off as being a featuer that we
would have no use for.
On the other hand after reading a little more..
My wife and I run a consultancy business and since we are self employed
we are not part of any pension plan.
So we have some of our retirement savings (wh
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Chris Travers wrote:
> First I think this is a great idea. However I have a few questions:
Thanks.:)
> 1) What segments of users are most likely to benefit from this?
Interesting. I'm not sure, actually. Not even sure how you define
segments, but I'll take a stab.
Any
