On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Håvard Sørli wrote:
> On 10. april 2012 16:38, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
>> There are other things which one would like recurring transactions for,
>> just as phone bills, where independant of FX rates, the amount varies
>> every month.
>>
>> My workflow is now
On 10. april 2012 16:38, Michael Richardson wrote:
> There are other things which one would like recurring transactions for,
> just as phone bills, where independant of FX rates, the amount varies
> every month.
>
> My workflow is now to just pull up the previous months transactions in
> Chart-of-
It occurs to me the best thing to do regarding altering things that
may need to be in the reconciliation report is to gather best
practices before engaging in documentation. I suspect (but will have
to double check) that even GL items with the same source number and
date will be aggregated into th
I understand the concern about reconciliation. There are current ways
to adjust payments/receipts in the UI, but it involves separate
transactions. Now that we see the concern, it may be something that
can be fixed through documentation.
In general, if you issue an payment or overpayment or suc
I guess it's a headless server? In that case I would be interested, if
only it'll be smaller than the Debian VirtualBox image available from
David Bandel ( http://david.bandel.us/software/software.shtml ).
Or is it configured to have a dynamically growing harddisk?
If so, what's the maximum size
Thanks, Erik,
> Error!*
>> *DELETE FROM gl WHERE id = '1'*
>> *
>> ERROR: permission denied for relation yearend*
>> *CONTEXT: SQL statement "delete from yearend where trans_id = old.id"*
>> PL/pgSQL function "del_yearend" line 3 at SQL statement*
>>
>
> To solve that you need to ru:
>
> GRANT del
>> I have tested this procedure, starting with a clean Ubuntu Server
>> installation, on a Virtualbox machine. I'm happy to make that machine
>> image available if it is of interest.
>
> How big is that image ?
1.3GB compressed.
I'm afraid I didn't make any effort to minimise the size, as it was
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> > "John" == John Locke writes:
>John> As mentioned on another thread, one change I would like to be
>John> able to make to a few posted invoices: change the contact
>John> within a customer -- e.g. to a new ECA.
>
> In
> "John" == John Locke writes:
John> As mentioned on another thread, one change I would like to be
John> able to make to a few posted invoices: change the contact
John> within a customer -- e.g. to a new ECA.
In other words, you write an invoice, send it, and then discover that
t
> "Håvard" == Håvard Sørli writes:
>>> I understand where that's coming from. I need to think about a
>>> good solution that would suit both you and an auditor to propose
>>> to you. Let me sleep on it a bit.
>>>
>>> Isn't the true problem here though that you can't ente
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Håvard Sørli wrote:
> On 09. april 2012 22:53, John Locke wrote:
>>> I understand where that's coming from. I need to think about a good
>>> solution that would suit both you and an auditor to propose to you.
>>> Let me sleep on it a bit.
>>>
>>> Isn't the true pro
> "Chris" == Chris Travers writes:
Chris> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Michael Richardson
Chris> wrote:
>> If reposted means that I can modify a PO before it is reconciled,
>> and then repost it (leaving an audit trail), then I'm okay.
Chris> I am not quite sure what
Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> Could you try with version 1.3.14? At some stage the excess LANGUAGE
> PLPGSQL has been removed on the 1.3 branch and it's no longer in 1.3.14
> which should solve at least that problem.
Thank you for replying, but no, this doesn't help. I get a slightly
different set of
On 09. april 2012 20:37, n...@npbroadcast.com wrote:
> I found problems with the existing Ubuntu installation instructions at:
> http://www.ledgersmb.org/help/install/Ubuntu_Installation_Tutorial_LedgerSMB-1.3-SERIES.html
Thank you for your testing and feedback. I have posted an "update" note
to
On 09. april 2012 22:53, John Locke wrote:
>> I understand where that's coming from. I need to think about a good
>> solution that would suit both you and an auditor to propose to you.
>> Let me sleep on it a bit.
>>
>> Isn't the true problem here though that you can't enter the
>> transaction in a
15 matches
Mail list logo
