Chris suggested that I post my message to him on the mail list. His
response is included. I do not do retail but some of you might find this of
value.
Regards,
Rich
-- Forwarded message --
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 6:12 AM, Rich Shepard
wrote:
> I don't know if yo
On Sat, 3 May 2014, Chris Bennett wrote:
> I am totally confused on how to come up with his owner's equity.
> Any advice?
Chris,
Seriously: ask your accountant. And you need an accountant familiar with
Guatamalian accounting practices and laws. No one here can advise you since
we're not quali
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014, Richard Hector wrote:
> Heartbleed isn't a problem with the encryption though; the encryption
> didn't get broken. Any protocol could probably potentially suffer from a
> buffer overflow due to a bug in the software. Given this one leaked info
> from the server process, who's
I copied my LaTeX templates directory for invoices, checks, etc. from the
L123 subdirectory to /opt/ledgersmb/templates/rshepard. I assume that the
'default' template for each printable document is that defined in the
subdirectory above since I entered that in System -> Defaults and saved the
in
On Sun, 6 Apr 2014, Robert J. Clay wrote:
> Those are defined in the the "[printers]" section in the ledgersmb.conf file.
Thanks, Robert.
Rich
--
___
Ledger-smb-users maili
I'm transitioning from Ledger123/SQL-Ledger which I've used for a decade.
I see major differences between the way I used to cut checks for vendors and
what seems to be the limitations under lsmb-1.3.39.
I just entered an invoice for a vendor, updated, saved, and posted.
Now I want to pri
On Wed, 2 Apr 2014, Paul Bolger wrote:
> I did notice that the apache api version is 20051115 which looks like
> a date to me... This is my first real encounter with postgres, so
> lot's of unfamiliar stuff.
Paul,
Looks like a date to me, too.
> cpan[6]> install mod_rewrite
> Warning: Cannot
On Tue, 1 Apr 2014, Rich Shepard wrote:
>> My apache version is 2.2.22 which I think is close to the latest.
>
> Er, no. I'm running 2.4.9 right now.
Let me clarify: there are major changes between httpd-2.2.x and
httpd-2.4.x. Many applications and server hosts are stic
On Wed, 2 Apr 2014, Paul Bolger wrote:
> A newer version of mod_rewrite?
Yep.
> My apache version is 2.2.22 which I think is close to the latest.
Er, no. I'm running 2.4.9 right now.
> Can you manually upgrade apache modules?
Yep. As root:
perl -MCPAN -e shell
when you see he cpan>
On Wed, 2 Apr 2014, Paul Bolger wrote:
> mod_rewrite (in apache) is definitely there and enabled, so what could be
> the problem?
If it's not commented out in httpd.conf then you might need a newer
version.
Rich
--
_
On Tue, 1 Apr 2014, Chris Travers wrote:
> Two options:
>
> 1. Go to System/Defaults, set the max dropdown. 1.3.39 had some bug fixes
> there.
Set it to 20.
> 2. You can use the text box as a search screen. Not entering anything
> brings up a list of vendors to select from.
Yes, when
Now that I have LSMB working I need to pay myself my monthly salary. On
the A/P transaction page the payee data entry widget should be a dropdown
list of vendors, similar to the dropdown list of accounts below that. This is
the same issue as account names in the G/L transaction entry page.
S
On Tue, 1 Apr 2014, Chris Travers wrote:
> I discovered a problem with reload-module.sh in the upgrade of someusers
> at Efficito. Please use the setup.pl for this release. Future versions
> will be supported, but not this one.
>
> At any rate it does not yet update the version number. You can
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014, Chris Travers wrote:
> We've released LedgerSMB 1.3.39.
Chris/Robert:
Thank you for making the upgrade so much easier and quicker than it was
with SQL-Ledger/Ledger-123.
One observation about process #2: after running reload_modules.sh on my
one database I logged in v
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014, Chris Travers wrote:
> In 1.4 we have this already. The only thing really stopping us from back
> porting that is that it relies on Dojo, which is a pretty heavy
> dependency.
Chris,
Ah, so! Excellent.
> I would as soon wait for that.
Works for me, too.
Many thanks
On Sun, 30 Mar 2014, Chris Travers wrote:
> Account numbers are hierarchical, so it makes sense to do a prefix match
> for those, but we can modify the logic so it does an internal match for
> description (so 'soft' would match 'Computer Software' as well as 'Income
> from Microsoft').
>
> Any obj
On Sun, 30 Mar 2014, o1bigtenor wrote:
> I hope it is allowed to offer a somewhat dissenting opinion.
> In Canada all business reporting is done using specific GIFI (General Index
> of Financial Information (IIRC)) codes. There are different codes for
> business and farm expenses (for the same ex
On Sun, 30 Mar 2014, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> True, for now, but we could enter an enhancement / feature request so it
> gets implemented when the screen(s) get changed or just if enough people
> see the benefit.
Hello Erik,
Please do put this on a list for implementation. Seems to me that no
On Sun, 30 Mar 2014, Pongrácz István wrote:
> If you start typing, the ajax widget will popup the list and you can
> choose. Just try to type.
István,
Yes, I see. And it works well as long as I know the account name. :-)
For example, if I enter the bank's name, or the word 'software' not
I've just started using ledgersmb. When I make a G/L entry I do not see a
drop-down list of accounts from which to select those for each side of the
transaction. Is there a way of displaying the CoA on each page when accounts
need to be entered?
Rich
---
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, beamends wrote:
> I'm afraid hacking about with the LSMB code is rather beyond me - in my C
> programs I can cheat and stick it into a while(!successful) loop, but real
> SQL ..
Richard,
I was pointing out a SQL resolution of the primary key conflict. SQL is
completely
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, beamends wrote:
> "DBD::Pg::st execute failed: ERROR: duplicate key violates unique
> constraint "partsvendor_pkey" at LedgerSMB/IC.pm line 529.
>
> Error!
>
> INSERT INTO partsvendor
> (vendor_id, parts_id,
> partnumber, lastcost,
> leadtime, curr)
> VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, Chris Travers wrote:
> Just to clarify the problem with prepayments:
>
> The issue is that payments in LedgerSMB (following SQL-Ledger 2.6) end up
> going against the same AR/AP account as the invoice. For prepayments,
> this is not correct accounting because it mixes liabilit
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, Bob Miller wrote:
> This sounds like pre-payments.
Bob,
Yup. That's what it is.
> Too my knowledge, for whatever that is worth, version 1.3 will support a
> pre-payment system, but the current version does not.
Oh. OK.
> This being said, I know at least some people h
I've used SL for about 9 years, but it's started to get squirrelly on me;
it's just not working as well as it used to. Unfortunately, Dieter's taken a
bad approach to his user community by shutting down the mail list (there's
now a Web-based forum but the quality of help there is very low). A ni
25 matches
Mail list logo
