Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Tex Order Template Weirdness

2011-06-15 Thread Chris Travers
Also I have reviewed the changes in LedgerSMB 1.2.18 through current svn and cannot find any relevant changes. At this point I suspect the problem is in the template, possibly exposing an obscure bug in LedgerSMB 1.2.x. I have checked everything I can readily check for changes, and I don't see an

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Tex Order Template Weirdness

2011-06-12 Thread Chris Travers
Luke: I tried to reproduce this by addingto the standard sales invoice and sales order templates and was thus far unable to.do so on recent svn. You might want to try the latest Form.pm and see if that fixes your problem/ Best Wishes, Chris Travers --

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Tex Order Template Weirdness

2011-06-12 Thread Luke
I'm reasonably sure that some problem has appeared in the template conditional code. I've had two or three issues now since the upgrade, that are all solvable by removing conditional code (address, address2, or email), and just including the fields directly. I've only noticed it in orders so

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Tex Order Template Weirdness

2011-06-12 Thread Chris Travers
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Chris Travers wrote: > I am looking into this issue specifically.  I am hoping to get 1.2.22 > out tomorrow  but maybe we can get a fix for whatever the behavior is > in 1.2.23? (A hotfix would be out sooner, perhaps tomorrow, and hopefully 1.2.23 could be in prer

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Tex Order Template Weirdness

2011-06-12 Thread Chris Travers
I am looking into this issue specifically. I am hoping to get 1.2.22 out tomorrow but maybe we can get a fix for whatever the behavior is in 1.2.23? Best Wishes, Chris Travers -- EditLive Enterprise is the world's most

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Tex Order Template Weirdness

2011-06-11 Thread Luke
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Chris Travers wrote: On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Luke wrote: I've never run into this.  Only thing I think I did, was upgrade from 1.2.18 to 1.2.21. When I try to print PDF, I'm seeing this.  The order template itself is attached. If 1307747392_sales_order_1109.

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Tex Order Template Weirdness

2011-06-11 Thread Pete Houston
Hi Luke, From your report of the error below it does look like there's a problem processing the end of the conditional line which blocks the following close brace and results in the runaway argument. Looking at my templates, I do not have this form of conditional where both the open an

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Tex Order Template Weirdness

2011-06-11 Thread Luke
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Chris Travers wrote: On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Luke wrote: I've never run into this.  Only thing I think I did, was upgrade from 1.2.18 to 1.2.21. When I try to print PDF, I'm seeing this.  The order template itself is attached. If 1307747392_sales_order_1109.

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Tex Order Template Weirdness

2011-06-10 Thread Luke
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Chris Travers wrote: On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Luke wrote: I've never run into this.  Only thing I think I did, was upgrade from 1.2.18 to 1.2.21. When I try to print PDF, I'm seeing this.  The order template itself is attached. If 1307747392_sales_order_1109.

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Tex Order Template Weirdness

2011-06-10 Thread Chris Travers
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Luke wrote: > I've never run into this.  Only thing I think I did, was upgrade from 1.2.18 > to 1.2.21. > > When I try to print PDF, I'm seeing this.  The order template itself is > attached. > > If 1307747392_sales_order_1109.log exists anywhere, I can't find

[Ledger-smb-users] Tex Order Template Weirdness

2011-06-10 Thread Luke
I've never run into this. Only thing I think I did, was upgrade from 1.2.18 to 1.2.21. When I try to print PDF, I'm seeing this. The order template itself is attached. If 1307747392_sales_order_1109.log exists anywhere, I can't find it. Error! This is pdfTeXk, Version 3.141592-1.4