The whinging from the scousers is deafening. Brilliant from Chelsea.
All set for City now.
Sent from my iPad
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email
Liverpoolha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha...
Cheers
Mark
El Presidente Wisconsin Whites
Leeds United
Chicago Fire
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options:
Amazing. You have to say Mourinho's the best. I'd kill for such boring tactics
at Leeds.
Sent from my iPhone
On 27 Apr 2014, at 23:02, Mark wiscole...@hotmail.com wrote:
Liverpoolha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha...
Cheers
Mark
El Presidente Wisconsin Whites
Leeds
Yes, there's a lot of love on this list for terrible but brutally efficient
football, isn't there?
On 27 Apr 2014, at 16:03, Ian Murray ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com wrote:
I'd kill for such boring tactics at Leeds.
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and
Suppose so.
But for once, in spite of everything I wanted them to win it this year.
Imagine how we'd have done with Poyet?
Maybe Whickam would have scored.
On 27 Apr 2014 18:01, Richard Walker richleed...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
The whinging from the scousers is deafening. Brilliant from Chelsea.
Not football. Winning maybe. But the death of the game. Plus he gets my
goat as an individual.
On 27 Apr 2014 18:04, Ian Murray ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com wrote:
Amazing. You have to say Mourinho's the best. I'd kill for such boring
tactics at Leeds.
Sent from my iPhone
On 27 Apr 2014, at
Eric,
If you think Chelsea's performance today was terrible then you're blind. Kalas
was incredible in midfield and he can't get in their team.
Reduced Gerrard and co to looking like Leeds on the attack. High balls, long
shots, they didn't have a clue. Chelsea were on a different planet.
Sent
I thought it was fascinating. Absolute master class.
Sent from my iPhone
On 27 Apr 2014, at 23:06, Ed Morrish edmorr...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, there's a lot of love on this list for terrible but brutally efficient
football, isn't there?
On 27 Apr 2014, at 16:03, Ian Murray
Agreed Ian. It was a brilliant display.
Sent from my iPad
On 27 Apr 2014, at 16:12, Ian Murray ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com wrote:
I thought it was fascinating. Absolute master class.
Sent from my iPhone
On 27 Apr 2014, at 23:06, Ed Morrish edmorr...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, there's a
Incredible to win 2-0 with 27% of the possession. O'leary's Leeds were similar
- although we won games with 40%.
Chelsea players must be machines to do all that running. Wouldn't surprise me
if there's a massive performance enhancing drugs exposé in the premier league
soon.
--
On 27 Apr
And if you thought it was football then, well, that just confirms everything I
already thought about you.
On 27 Apr 2014, at 16:09, Richard Walker richleed...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
If you think Chelsea's performance today was terrible then you're blind.
Truly, Mourinho is one of the all-time greatest trainers and tacticians. But
it's fucking dreadful to watch. You may as well say Simon Cowell makes the best
music because he has all those number one records.
On 27 Apr 2014, at 16:21, Jim Moran j...@jimmoran.co.uk wrote:
Chelsea players must
I don't enjoy watching Chelsea at all - just commenting on it. Liverpool
bottled it today IMHO.
--
On 27 Apr 2014, at 16:25, Ed Morrish edmorr...@gmail.com wrote:
Truly, Mourinho is one of the all-time greatest trainers and tacticians. But
it's fucking dreadful to watch. You may as well
They had no answer to the tactics that everyone who knows anything about
football knew Mourinho would employ. His asking the FA for permission to play a
weakened team is pure poetry. People actually bought that!
Liverpool didn't bottle it - they couldn't do it. Big difference.
Sent from my
But football isn't about entertainment, it's about winning.
Sean
-Original Message-
From: Ed Morrish edmorr...@gmail.com
To: Jim Moran j...@jimmoran.co.uk
Cc: leedslist leedslist@gn.apc.org
Sent: Sun, Apr 27, 2014 11:25 am
Subject: Re: [LU] Yes !!
Truly, Mourinho is one of the
It's about both, surely? I'd probably be happy if Leeds won the occasional
mismatch by parking the bus as some diva prick once put it. But why, unless
you had a pre-existing emotional attachment to them, would you pay money to
watch two teams play like Chelsea did? Tedious in the extreme.
On
Chelsea had
No Cech.
No Terry.
No Luiz.
No Ramires.
No Oscar.
No Hazard.
No Eto'o.
Football is about winning !
And another point, Chelsea are one of the top scorers in the league. Horses for
courses. Brendan Rodgers has a first team that plays one way, he has no other
options.
On 27 Apr
It wasn't tedious though - it was fascinating to those who understand the game.
Sent from my iPhone
On 28 Apr 2014, at 0:34, Ed Morrish edmorr...@gmail.com wrote:
It's about both, surely? I'd probably be happy if Leeds won the occasional
mismatch by parking the bus as some diva prick once
It was only fascinating because of Liverpool.
On 27 Apr 2014, at 17:47, Ian Murray ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com wrote:
It wasn't tedious though - it was fascinating to those who understand the
game.
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options:
Then you support the wrong club, don't you? Perhaps you'd be happier at
Stamford Bridge...?
On 27 Apr 2014, at 17:44, Richard Walker richleed...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Football is about winning !
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options:
I doubt it - they're all prawn sandwiching eating nob jocks.
On 27 Apr 2014, at 17:57, Ed Morrish edmorr...@gmail.com wrote:
Then you support the wrong club, don't you? Perhaps you'd be happier at
Stamford Bridge...?
On 27 Apr 2014, at 17:44, Richard Walker richleed...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Well, eat before you go then.
On 27 Apr 2014, at 18:06, Richard Walker richleed...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
I doubt it - they're all prawn sandwiching eating nob jocks
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options:
But that's just it. I wouldn't pay money to watch two teams play like Chelsea
did unless I had a pre-existing emotional attachment to them. There's no law
forcing anyone to watch teams they don't support, and there's no law that says
teams get points for aesthetics. It's not ice dancing, it's
You could have paid money to watch Chelsea destroy arsenal 6-0 or beat psg or
countless other games where they have played great attacking football.
As rich says they had practically a whole team out.
I have watched some shite arsenal games and also tedious barca games on sky.
They are
Football is about passion. And I dislike Morrinhio with a passion.
Michael
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
John 'Grampa' Sykes
I always hated Chelsea more than any other team in England. The
mid-nineties ManU had nothing on them.
Yet I would love them to win the Premier League and the European Cup this
year - and why? Because of Mourinho who is on the one hand the ultimate
fusion of football and Machiavelli, and on the
Mouriniho doesn't hate, he just plans and destroys!
Sent from my iPad
On 28 Apr 2014, at 00:56, Michael Ian Dr Benjamin m...@myray.com wrote:
Football is about passion. And I dislike Morrinhio with a passion.
Michael
___
Leedslist mailing list
...And bullies.
Although obviously I appreciate that not everyone on this list understands why
that's a bad thing.
On 27 Apr 2014, at 20:06, Matt Anderson m...@leeds-united.net wrote:
Mouriniho doesn't hate, he just plans and destroys!
___
Yes, to be fair that was impressive, to get that result with second-string
has-beens and untested kids. I mean, they played like a starting XI that cost
£110m to put together and had nearly 600 international caps between them! Great
stuff.
On 27 Apr 2014, at 19:46, Matt Anderson
To be fair Ed the press said the same about us for much of the late 60s and
1970s
Sent from my iPhone
On 27 Apr 2014, at 16:06, Ed Morrish edmorr...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, there's a lot of love on this list for terrible but brutally efficient
football, isn't there?
On 27 Apr 2014, at
Bullying is bad. But who has he bullied? Benitez? Wenger? Some referees?
His players would die for him! It's obvious they love him.
Everything he says and does is carefully planned.
You could call all the successful managers bullies
Sent from my iPhone
On 28 Apr 2014, at 01:27, Ed Morrish
Exactly. Yesterday was Rodgers' failure. He knew how Mourinho would set up. He
didn't need to win. He could have put ten behind the ball himself - Chelsea
needed the win. He played right into Mourinho's hands.
Mourinho is the best manager in the world and was the best manager in the world
last
Ian wrote:
Exactly. Yesterday was Rodgers' failure. He knew how Mourinho would set
up. He didn't need to win. He could have put ten behind the ball himself -
Chelsea needed the win. He played right into Mourinho's hands
God help us all if so. He's returning to the mind numbing Italian
33 matches
Mail list logo
