[LU] Jim Storrie RIP

2015-02-13 Thread David Campbell
Obituary in Thurs Independent. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/jim-storrie-insideforward-who-score d-consistently-for-don-revies-first-trophywinning-leeds-united-side-of-the-1 960s-10039837.html?origin=internalSearch I get the impression that the Independent is very good at p

Re: [LU] Jim Storrie RIP

2015-02-13 Thread John Boocock
I get the impression that the Independent is very good at publishing obituaries for our players of that era, do we have a "mole" working there ? That'll be theboyweth no doubt :-) Betty ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.

[LU] In trouble, again

2015-02-13 Thread Jeremy Adams
http://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/sport/leeds-united/latest-whites-news/leeds-united-embroiled-in-fresh-legal-battle-1-7105861 This seems to be coming a monthly occurrence.Does this one have any legs? Jeremy __

[LU] Tomorrow

2015-02-13 Thread Richard Naef
OK, so surely the decision for Redders tomorrow (assuming Rudy is fit) is whether to a) stay 4-5-1 - and if so whether to put Antenucci in for Morison b) go to 4-4-2 - and try a combination of Morison, Antenucci, Doukara or Sharp? Thoughts? ttfn Richard _

Re: [LU] Tomorrow

2015-02-13 Thread Simon McNally
I wouldn't change a winning team. Stick with same lineup / formation as Tuesday Simon Sent from my iPhone > On 13 Feb 2015, at 20:29, Richard Naef > wrote: > > OK, so surely the decision for Redders tomorrow (assuming Rudy is fit) is > whether to > > > > a) stay 4-5-1 - and if so whether

Re: [LU] Tomorrow

2015-02-13 Thread Richard Walker
B) is not an option. Sent from my iPad > On 13 Feb 2015, at 20:29, Richard Naef > wrote: > > OK, so surely the decision for Redders tomorrow (assuming Rudy is fit) is > whether to > > > > a) stay 4-5-1 - and if so whether to put Antenucci in for Morison > > > > b) go to 4-4-2 - and try

Re: [LU] Tomorrow

2015-02-13 Thread davidwoolmer
Agreed. Would be crazy to switch from 4-5-1. Suspect Austin will come back in for injured  Bianchi as Millwall feels like an Austin kind of match. Flying back in for this one. Classic Valentine's stuff.    Original Message   From: Richard Walker Sent: Friday, 13 February 2015 21:33 To: Richard

Re: [LU] Tomorrow

2015-02-13 Thread nat...@sky.com
Yes got to stick with the same formation - even though that is quite defensive for the home team, a draw is not a bad result for us in some ways. Can always bring on Sharp, Cani, Antenucci etc for the last 20mins if needs beTo me, since Sloth got a lot of plaudits in midweek, is whether to keep

[LU] Fwd: LUST Statement: Leeds City Holdings

2015-02-13 Thread John Boocock
Sent in great haste from a mobile phone Original message From: Leeds United Supporters Trust Date:13/02/2015 20:44 (GMT+00:00) To: John Subject: LUST Statement: Leeds City Holdings Leeds United Supporters Trust Statement Is this email not displaying correctly? View it i

Re: [LU] Tomorrow

2015-02-13 Thread Richard Naef
So you think Morison, is a better bet than Antenucci? I've watched Tuesday's match and Morison did have a good game, BUT not as lone striker, I think Antenucci plays that role better. I'm also intrigued about Cani, Did Redfern choose him or is he a Cellino/Salerno pick? > -Original Mess

Re: [LU] Fwd: LUST Statement: Leeds City Holdings

2015-02-13 Thread tim . whelan
I don't follow how "the Receiver could potentially sell the club from its current owners." I can understand how the Receiver could order the sale of the 5% shareholding held by Leeds City Holdings, as that is an asset of the company being wound up, which should be sold to raise funds to go towa