Re: [LU] [Non-LU] 2 - 2

2013-03-10 Thread David Nattan
I agree things are looking up a bit, Warnock has at long last found his best XI and it is pretty decent. Having said that we will not make the play offs unless we can start to win away. We also won't make the play offs if we cannot hold onto a lead. Wolves and Leicester - 4 points thrown away in in

Re: [LU] [Non-LU] 2 - 2

2013-03-10 Thread Richard Walker
That's bollox Paul. Lets face it , at lot of the last 10 years ain't been the best especially under Bates and having the likes of Becchio trying to control a ball and restricting the way we play but there's been some real highs and I have praised those and I think recent performances are somethi

Re: [LU] [Non-LU] 2 - 2

2013-03-10 Thread Paul Cundell
> I'm not on about disagreeing or agreeing with me just some comment about how > things have improved recently. You've been negative for 10 years, I think you've a nerve calling anyone a negative c@nt. Improving? The jury is out - 10 points while scoring 6 and conceding 7 goals in 8 games sin

Re: [LU] [Non-LU] 2 - 2

2013-03-10 Thread Richard Walker
Oh sorry - surely you know my post is going to be about Becchio so just delete them all, but I will from now. I'm not on about disagreeing or agreeing with me just some comment about how things have improved recently. I think things are the best for a while. Remember Barnsley ... Seems like a

Re: [LU] [Non-LU] 2 - 2

2013-03-10 Thread Paul Cundell
May I recommend a non-lu tag if you insist on posting about Norwich? Rich W wrote: > Get used to it mate - Becchio watch is here to stay. > May I recommend the delete button if you don't want to hear how we have sold > a dud to Norwich. ___ Leedslis