[LU] Table

2017-11-02 Thread nat...@sky.com
I just thought that I would take a look at last seasons final table and it turns out if we lose every single game from now till the end of the season we will end up on the same number of points as Rotherham last time ! We have 23 points the same as they managed all season. Slightly more worrying

[LU] Table

2011-01-03 Thread Dr Michael Benjamin
Take a look at the table. Its still all up for grabs. A top six place is not a certainty. If we win tomorrow and then go on a run well that would be good. But I have feeling that we are about to do a typical Leeds [ look as if you could and then blow it] and slump to 8th position. The team has sti

[LU] Table

2012-01-11 Thread Dr Michael Benjamin
There are 14 teams within 12 points or less from the top place. In short the best manager wins. Is that Grayson? To be fair he has to given the time to take his chance. If he has another bad run of gutless shows then he should go immediately. If not then he stays the season. But if we are not promo

[LU] Table

2012-01-11 Thread Sutton / Smail
It looks as though you've allowed Grayson some slack based on previous messages. Are you changing your thinking on him??!! Grayson has had a generous spell in charge though with one promotion to show for it. I very much doubt even play offs at this stage. Has his contract been renewed? I sound

Re: [LU] Table

2017-11-02 Thread GRAHAM THIRKILL
Who added the    "FLAME WARS 'R US" Line at the bottom of all the messages, it could encourage the wrong type of messages in my opinion and cause a bit of unrest it's a bit silly really and could cause flame wars Thirkers (The Legend) On Thursday, 2 November 2017, 12:35, "nat...@sk

Re: [LU] Table

2017-11-02 Thread Simon McNally
I saw the other day that we have exactly the same points after 15 games as we did last year. The next 10-15 matches are crucial now. Last year we went on a good run, we need more of the same this season! Sent from my iPhone > On 2 Nov 2017, at 12:34, "nat...@sky.com" wrote: > > I just thought

Re: [LU] Table

2017-11-02 Thread {broken-address}
Now there’s an uplifting message Dave - gulp! Still, it’s better than you know who though! I think we’ll know in 3 games time whether we’re in for a relegation campaign or something slightly more uplifting. Sent from my iPad > > > I just thought that I would take a look at last seasons final

Re: [LU] Table

2012-01-11 Thread Jim Moran
Sometimes stats are bollocks, but compare Graysons win% in charge of Leeds to our 2 only successful managers, and that O'Leary joker. Don 52% Grayson 50% O'Leary 49% Wilko 42% Suppose it's the games you win, rather that the number of wins. FYI draws and losses are similar proportions for all of t

Re: [LU] Table

2012-01-11 Thread Dr. Michael Benjamin.
Liked your post. No not changed my mind I think he's no good. But his jammy win means that we go through the transfer window with him. And this ruin the season. But I was realistic about what will happen. Bates won't want to get a new manager to use Grayson's men. I think that here the MS is b

Re: [LU] Table

2012-01-12 Thread Simon Hart
I'm sure Don's win ration would have been greater had they played under the 3 points for a win system. Jim Moran wrote: Sometimes stats are bollocks, but compare Graysons win% in charge of Leeds to our 2 only successful managers, and that O'Leary joker. Don 52% Grayson 50% O'Leary 49% Wilko 4

Re: [LU] Table

2012-01-12 Thread Jim Moran
Hmm, I suppose. holding on for the draw more desirable I suppose. Hadn't thought of that. Shankly also 52% for reference, not that I was born or anything. On 12 January 2012 09:53, Simon Hart wrote: > I'm sure Don's win ration would have been greater had they played under > the 3 points for a w