Re: [LU] 1 0 up

Thanks for all the help. I will be having a look today. > On 13 Apr 2016, at 03:29, David Komadina wrote: > > this is what it says in my gmail spam - > > Why is this message in Spam? It has a from address in yahoo.co.uk but has > failed yahoo.co.uk's required tests for

Re: [LU] 1 0 up

this is what it says in my gmail spam - *Why is this message in Spam? It has a from address in yahoo.co.uk but has failed yahoo.co.uk 's required tests for authentication.* it used to just be the occasional LU message that went in , now it seems to be all

Re: [LU] 1 0 up

You've started going to my spam as well Rich. I've even added you to my safe list. Gmail has decided Leeds are no longer relevant to me. Clever bloody algorithms. -- > On 12 Apr 2016, at 20:25, Andy Clayton wrote: > > Found this in my spam box and I didn't even put

Re: [LU] 1 0 up

I care - not much, but I care :-) Ossie > Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 19:13:06 + > From: nat...@sky.com > To: leedslist@gn.apc.org > Subject: [LU] 1 0 up > > I know no-one cares but we are one up - Dallas > ___ > Leeds

Re: [LU] 1 0 up

Found this in my spam box and I didn't even put it there. Sent from my iPad > On 12 Apr 2016, at 15:15, Richard Walker wrote: > > Sounds good on RL. > > I've no idea why my posts are not appearing on the list > > > >> On 12 Apr 2016, at 20:13, "nat...@sky.com"

Re: [LU] 1 0 up

Sounds good on RL. I've no idea why my posts are not appearing on the list > On 12 Apr 2016, at 20:13, "nat...@sky.com" wrote: > > I know no-one cares but we are one up - Dallas > ___ > Leedslist mailing list > Info and options: