Howson didn't have to go. He could have signed the contract that was
offered to him, which would have been more than his current wages, but a lot
less than the one Norwich offered. Re-signed for Leeds, played out of his skin,
then renegotiated in the Summer once he'd powered us to the premier
Behalf Of Ian Murray
> Sent: 23 January 2012 22:33
> To: Matt Anderson
> Cc: Leeds List;
> Subject: Re: [LU] Danny Pugh
>
> Kind of irrelevant really. Parker told the truth. He didn't want to go but
> Ken wanted the money.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
&g
Make all the excuses for Bates that you want but after his revelations in
Saturdays programme we now know that we, the fans, pay the 4th highest ticket
prices in the country whilst he, the club, pay the 18th highest wages in the
division, at best.
> Erm, Parker said pretty much what Grayson sai
ray
> Sent: 23 January 2012 22:33
> To: Matt Anderson
> Cc: Leeds List;
> Subject: Re: [LU] Danny Pugh
>
> Kind of irrelevant really. Parker told the truth. He didn't want to go but
> Ken wanted the money.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
>
.
-Original Message-
From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On
Behalf Of Ian Murray
Sent: 23 January 2012 22:33
To: Matt Anderson
Cc: Leeds List;
Subject: Re: [LU] Danny Pugh
Kind of irrelevant really. Parker told the truth. He didn't want to go but Ken
wante
id in one lump though
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On
> Behalf Of Eric Barlier
> Sent: 23 January 2012 21:54
> To: p...@cundell.com
> Cc: Leeds List
> Subject: Re: [LU] Danny Pugh
>
&
...@cundell.com
Cc: Leeds List
Subject: Re: [LU] Danny Pugh
the only source of the 750k sum I ve seen is a lister. I ve seen it nowhere
else.
Sent from my iPhone
On 23 Jan 2012, at 20:33, "Paul Cundell" wrote:
>> I have deleted an awful lot recently without eading, but didn't we
the only source of the 750k sum I ve seen is a lister. I ve seen it nowhere
else.
Sent from my iPhone
On 23 Jan 2012, at 20:33, "Paul Cundell" wrote:
>> I have deleted an awful lot recently without eading, but didn't we get £2M
>> for Howson?
>
> Apparently it's £750k up front, rising to £2m
-Original Message-
From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On
Behalf Of Steve Gillen
Sent: 23 January 2012 20:19
To: 'Tim Leslie'; leedslist@gn.apc.org
Subject: Re: [LU] Danny Pugh
I have deleted an awful lot recently without reading,
I have deleted an awful lot recently without reading,
You and me both pal..
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
PETE CASS
2:20 PM
> Subject: Re: [LU] Danny Pugh
>
>
>
>
>>> Noone seems to have come up with an explanation as to why Kevin 'me and
>>> Gary Kelly' Blackwell got backed by Bates. We actually spent a fair bit of
>>> cash under him.
>
>
> Ba
Where is Blackwell now?
From: duncan lee
To: alec...@gmail.com; leedslist@gn.apc.org
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 12:20 PM
Subject: Re: [LU] Danny Pugh
> > Noone seems to have come up with an explanation as to why Kevin 'me and
> > Gary
Ah - of course!
Ian
Sent from my iPhone
On 23 Jan 2012, at 17:20, duncan lee wrote:
>
>
>
>>> Noone seems to have come up with an explanation as to why Kevin 'me and
>>> Gary Kelly' Blackwell got backed by Bates. We actually spent a fair bit of
>>> cash under him.
>
>
> Bates probably al
> > Noone seems to have come up with an explanation as to why Kevin 'me and
> > Gary Kelly' Blackwell got backed by Bates. We actually spent a fair bit of
> > cash under him.
Bates probably allowed Blackwell to spend money because it was our Premier
league relegation parachute payments. It wa
> I have deleted an awful lot recently without eading, but didn't we get £2M
> for Howson?
Apparently it's £750k up front, rising to £2m after add ons.
Hardly worth losing a couple of hunded ST holders over IMHO.
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and optio
> But we sell England U21 international Howson for 750k and Bates is 250k
> up. Brick by brick Rich!!
>
I have deleted an awful lot recently without eading, but didn't we get £2M
for Howson?
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman.gre
Is that why KB is now gunshy? Has he tried buying his way to Premier league
and it didn't work?
On 23 January 2012 06:31, Ian Murray wrote:
> But we sell England U21 international Howson for 750k and Bates is 250k
> up. Brick by brick Rich!!
>
> Noone seems to have come up with an explanation as
But we sell England U21 international Howson for 750k and Bates is 250k up.
Brick by brick Rich!!
Noone seems to have come up with an explanation as to why Kevin 'me and Gary
Kelly' Blackwell got backed by Bates. We actually spent a fair bit of cash
under him.
Sent from my iPhone
On 22 Jan 20
Did the club officially declare how much we paid for Danny Pugh ?
Someone said over the weekend it was 500k, which would surprise me
1) I wouldn't believe Bates would pay that much for 1 player
2) That would be a ridiculous amount to play for a cart horse
Sent from my iPad
On 22 Jan 2012, at
Generally happy with first half although we concede possession at times too
easily.
For me Danny Pugh took his goal well but he doesn't contribute much else. Aidy
White needs to play left midfield although he's also been our best defender.
Clayton seems to be playing a reserved role whilst Hows
Regards
Wayne
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)
Danny Pugh
Danny Pugh
He gets the ball and scores a goal
Danny Danny Pugh
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
MARCHING ON TOGETHE
I haerd that figure too David - I'd want a country for that sort on money!
--- On Sun, 15/5/11, David Brennan wrote:
From: David Brennan
Subject: Re: [LU] Danny Pugh
To: "leedslist@gn.apc.org"
Date: Sunday, 15 May, 2011, 8:55
> Message: 5
> Date: Sat, 14 May 2011
@gn.apc.org
Subject: Re: [LU] Danny Pugh
> Message: 5
> Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 19:06:50 +0300
> From: "Dr. Michael Benjamin. "
> Subject: Re: [LU] Danny Pugh
>
> Why not? They lost.
> Stoke are a product of their manager.
> Good to see Ballotelli finally grow up.
&g
> Message: 5
> Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 19:06:50 +0300
> From: "Dr. Michael Benjamin. "
> Subject: Re: [LU] Danny Pugh
>
> Why not? They lost.
> Stoke are a product of their manager.
> Good to see Ballotelli finally grow up.
> Shows how far we have to go.
gt; championship
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
>
> From: Jim Moran
> Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 18:04:28 +0100
> To: Dr. Michael Benjamin.
> Cc: Matt Anderson;
>
> Subject: Re: [LU] Danny Pugh
>
> You think Stoke are a big club?
>
> On 14 May
It crushes my soul to see Ford Super Sunday Wigan v Stoke when we are in the
championship
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
-Original Message-
From: Jim Moran
Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 18:04:28
To: Dr. Michael Benjamin.
Cc: Matt Anderson;
Subject: Re: [LU] Danny Pugh
You think
:-)
Sure, the potters must have a lot of cups.
Sent from my iPhone
D"r Michael Benjamin
Community Psychiatry
On 14 May 2011, at 20:04, Jim Moran wrote:
> You think Stoke are a big club?
>
> On 14 May 2011 18:01, Dr. Michael Benjamin. wrote:
> Agree with everything apart from 'small club'
_
You think Stoke are a big club?
On 14 May 2011 18:01, Dr. Michael Benjamin. wrote:
> Agree with everything apart from 'small club'
>
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscri
ichael Benjamin. [mailto:beden...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 14 May 2011 17:07
> To: Matt Anderson
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: [LU] Danny Pugh
>
>
>
> Why not? They lost.
> Stoke are a product of their manager.
> Good to see Ballotelli finally grow up.
> Shows how far we have
cup
final!
From: Dr. Michael Benjamin. [mailto:beden...@gmail.com]
Sent: 14 May 2011 17:07
To: Matt Anderson
Cc:
Subject: Re: [LU] Danny Pugh
Why not? They lost.
Stoke are a product of their manager.
Good to see Ballotelli finally grow up.
Shows how far we have to go.
Sent from my iPhone
D
Why not? They lost.
Stoke are a product of their manager.
Good to see Ballotelli finally grow up.
Shows how far we have to go.
Sent from my iPhone
D"r Michael Benjamin
Community Psychiatry
On 14 May 2011, at 18:57, "Matt Anderson" wrote:
> . in a cup final!!! How did that happen!
>
> _
. in a cup final!!! How did that happen!
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)
33 matches
Mail list logo
