> According to
> http://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons/lib/research/rp99/r
> p99-111.pdf
> life expectancy for a UK male has gone from about 70 to about
> 75 in between
> 1981 & 2011 - say 7,5% increase, I can't find the exact
> figures at the moment but productivity per worker over the
>
from my BlackBerry® wireless device
-Original Message-
From: "Dr. Michael Benjamin. "
Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 11:58:36
To: m...@leeds-united.net
Cc: Mark Humphries; Leeds
list; Jim Moran;
DaveSowden; LEEDS List
Subject: Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?
There can never ever b
I have to agree with Dr. Mike on this, although my heart feels that ManU
fans should be deprived of all voting rights, just because.
There can never ever be a bar to voting no matter what the erstwhile 'good '
reason.
The minute you permit anyone to ' define' eligibility then along come
someone
org
> Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 09:09:29
> To: 'Jim Moran'; 'Dave Sowden'
> Cc: 'LEEDS List'
> Subject: Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?
>
> I find compulsory voting an affront to freedom of speech. Or the freedom to
> not speak.
>
> If people don&
leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org
Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 09:09:29
To: 'Jim Moran'; 'Dave Sowden'
Cc: 'LEEDS List'
Subject: Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?
I find compulsory voting an affront to freedom of speech. Or the freedom to
not speak.
If people don't know or don&#
nswer - how exciting!
-Original Message-
From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On
Behalf Of Jim Moran
Sent: 07 May 2011 08:29
To: Dave Sowden
Cc: LEEDS List
Subject: Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?
Or, 26% of the electorate said no, 14% said yes and 60% couldn'
An overwhelming majority of voters thought Leeds should be heavily fined and
docked 15 points.
>
> What was the results of voting on Thursday?
>
> Dr Michael Benjamin,
> Community Psychiatrist
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailma
Were there Local Elections too?
Michael
Dr Michael Benjamin,
Community Psychiatrist
---
myRay: On-line Self-Help CBT
http://www.myRay.com
--
Mental Health:
http//www.MyDoctorExplains.com
Auditing || Quality Con
Or, 26% of the electorate said no, 14% said yes and 60% couldn't be
bothered either way.
How's about a referendum on compulsory voting next time?
On 7 May 2011, at 08:25, Dave Sowden wrote:
>
>
>>
>> What was the results of voting on Thursday?
>>
>> Dr Michael Benjamin,
>> Community Psychiatr
>
> What was the results of voting on Thursday?
>
> Dr Michael Benjamin,
> Community Psychiatrist
They tried to make us vote for AV, we said No, No, No.Yes vote at 32.1% and the
No vote at 67.9%. ... unless the FA disciplinary committee believes there
has been malpractice and awards the
What was the results of voting on Thursday?
Dr Michael Benjamin,
Community Psychiatrist
---
myRay: On-line Self-Help CBT
http://www.myRay.com
--
Mental Health:
http//www.MyDoctorExplains.com
Auditing || Qualit
According to
http://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons/lib/research/rp99/rp99-111.pdf
life expectancy for a UK male has gone from about 70 to about 75 in between
1981 & 2011 - say 7,5% increase, I can't find the exact figures at the
moment but productivity per worker over the same period has incre
As I said, "invest[ment] into productive enterprise" - if you are a baker,
you probably won't be able to manually make bread anymore (in economically
significant quantities) once your in your 70s - if though you invest in a
bread making machine with some of your surplus during your productive years
HEAR HEAR !
Damian Walsh wrote:
> PS my first IS job in 1985 was reprogramming pension schemes to allow
> "premium holes" and "premium holidays" so that the employers contributions
> did not have to be paid.
Class Traitor.. :-)
___
>
> Final Salary pensions are perfectly sustainable if they are
> properly funded, and if the funding is invested into
> productive enterprise (for want of a better word).
I have to say I couldn't agree less. Contributions make up a small part of
the final pot., it is the predictions of growt
On 04/05/2011 21:44, Damian Walsh wrote:
PS my first IS job in 1985 was reprogramming pension schemes to allow
"premium holes" and "premium holidays" so that the employers contributions
did not have to be paid.
Class Traitor.. :-)
___
Final Salary pensions are perfectly sustainable if they are properly funded,
and if the funding is invested into productive enterprise (for want of a
better word).
Today's problem with Final Salary Pensions is the funding. Public Service
pensions are unfunded with the govt making guarantees out of
Don't worry about "anti-lawyer abuse" on this list. I think you'll find that
we're all very "pro lawyer-abuse" here!
Damian ;)
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
>
>
> *braces self for anti-lawyer abuse*
>
>
___
Leedslist mailing list
In
unich.de; rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk; leedslist@gn.apc.org
Subject: RE: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 17:55:47 +0100
The benefit of the retrospectoscope is that it’s based on cold hard facts, not
mystical powers. Like the assumption Major wouldn’t have invested in public
services wi
urray [mailto:ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com]
Sent: 04 May 2011 17:40
To: mark.humphr...@blueyonder.co.uk
Cc: rhe...@mis-munich.de; rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk;
leedslist@gn.apc.org
Subject: RE: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?
Whereas obviously you're seeing all this through the retrospectoscope.
Hind
On 04/05/2011 14:23, Mark Humphries wrote:
Either way you look at it, it is
Blair/Brown/Darling to blame, not Cameron, not Clegg, not FPTP, not the
Queen and not Ken Bates.
And just how do you know it's not Ken Bates, Mark? Whio knows what shit
the old beardy bastard is dreaming up with his
;slash and burn"
cuts and to trust their economic nouse, and some people believe him.
-Original Message-
From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On
Behalf Of Richard Naef
Sent: 04 May 2011 17:25
To: leedslist@gn.apc.org
Subject: Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good o
e for adopting your pedantry, the Tories did not get in. They
had to form a coalition to form a government.
> From: mark.humphr...@blueyonder.co.uk
> To: ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com
> CC: rhe...@mis-munich.de; rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk;
> leedslist@gn.apc.org
> Subject: RE: [LU
; Richard Naef;
Subject: Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?
We would have been in a much worse position under the Tories 1997-2008 since
they would have made vast improvements to healthcare, the schooling system,
ema, minimum wage etc etc etc.
___
Leedslist
> I can see this is all upsetting you, so I will just say it
> doesn't matter what the tories (or libdems) thought about the
> deregulation of the financial services sector, Labour did the
> deed, no one else. I also don't remember reading any other
> chancellor in the developed world claimin
Ian Murray [mailto:ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com]
> Sent: 04 May 2011 14:59
> To: Mark Humphries
> Cc: Robert Heath; Richard Naef;
> Subject: Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?
>
> OK mate. I'll defer to your supreme knowledge of macroeconomic affairs. All
> I'll say is you conve
52.
-Original Message-
From: Ian Murray [mailto:ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com]
Sent: 04 May 2011 14:59
To: Mark Humphries
Cc: Robert Heath; Richard Naef;
Subject: Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?
OK mate. I'll defer to your supreme knowledge of macroeconomic affairs. All
I'll say i
hope for a sustained recovery) is Oik and
Dave's fault. Ably assisted by Cleggster
>
> What a shitter.
Indeed.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Murray. [mailto:ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com]
> VSent: 04 May 2011 14:00
> To: Mark Humphries
> Cc: Robert Heath
c.org
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 11:57:34
To: 'Robert Heath'; 'Richard
Naef';
Subject: Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?
Collecting the extra tax revenue from those idiot tourists (from UK and
overseas) who came into town to watch the poncey horses and raf jet? And
broadcasting right
@gn.apc.org
Subject: Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?
>>PLANE SPOTTER ALERT. PLANE SPOTTER ALERT. PLANE SPOTTER ALERT. ;-)<<
Ah, you need to get in touch with your inner anorak ;-)
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options:
ht
otmail.com]
Sent: 04 May 2011 14:00
To: Mark Humphries
Cc: Robert Heath; Richard Naef;
Subject: Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?
Maybe we can use the cake and pop tax revenue to fill this deficit you seem
so concerned about?
Or no, we have to offset that against the net loss to the economy of
billio
all the street parties?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On
> Behalf Of Robert Heath
> Sent: 04 May 2011 10:54
> To: Richard Naef; leedslist@gn.apc.org
> Subject: Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?
>
> S
>>PLANE SPOTTER ALERT. PLANE SPOTTER ALERT. PLANE SPOTTER ALERT. ;-)<<
Ah, you need to get in touch with your inner anorak ;-)
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsub
On 04/05/2011 11:50, Tim Leslie wrote:
PLANE SPOTTER ALERT. PLANE SPOTTER ALERT. PLANE SPOTTER ALERT. ;-)
I only saw the flypast on the news, having spent the day building a bin
store
Didn't work though did it? They still found him.
___
Leedslist maili
Sorry pal but I was talking about the benefits of us having a written
constitution and being a Republic. Dunno how this became a party political
debate about economics! You shouldn't assume I'm a labour supporter (I am, but
you shouldn't assume!).
:-)
Sent from my iPhone
On 4 May 2011, at 10
: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On
Behalf Of Robert Heath
Sent: 04 May 2011 10:54
To: Richard Naef; leedslist@gn.apc.org
Subject: Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?
Since this long political thread has come round to the subject of The Cuts,
perhaps I could link it back to
Last time Rob paid taxes I think the Lancaster/hurricane and spitfire were
defending us
:-)
-Original Message-
From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On
Behalf Of Tim Leslie
Sent: 04 May 2011 11:12
To: leedslist@gn.apc.org
Subject: Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good
PLANE SPOTTER ALERT. PLANE SPOTTER ALERT. PLANE SPOTTER ALERT. ;-)
I only saw the flypast on the news, having spent the day building a bin
store and clearing out loads of rubbish.
>
>>>As for the RAF Jets, most of the planes were decommisioned ones. If we
> are
> still being defended by Spitfires
>>As for the RAF Jets, most of the planes were decommisioned ones. If we
are
still being defended by Spitfires, Lancaster Bombers and Typhoons then we
are in the sh*t if someone attacks us ala 1941<<
We are still very much being defended by Typhoons!
It's what the RAF calls a Eurofi
y 04, 2011 7:53 PM
Subject: Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?
Since this long political thread has come round to the subject of The
Cuts, perhaps I could link it back to the original issue.
I understood that the good old generous Royals footed the bill for the
so-called wedding, and all the rest of
Well the 'prancing around on horses' bit is pretty self explanatory as
they are called the Household Cavalry.
As for the RAF Jets, most of the planes were decommisioned ones. If we are
still being defended by Spitfires, Lancaster Bombers and Typhoons then we
are in the sh*t if someone attacks us al
Since this long political thread has come round to the subject of The Cuts,
perhaps I could link it back to the original issue.
I understood that the good old generous Royals footed the bill for the
so-called wedding, and all the rest of us had to do was stump up the paltry 20
million quid for
> But anyway, your analogy about lancing the boil fits very
> well with the structural deficit plans over 4, not 5 years.
SNIP
> only difference was the timing of and depth of the initial cuts.
trouble is the "major cuts" aren't really major - despite the real pain that
will be caused to man
And Labour's plan to reduce the deficit wouldn't be called "slash and burn"?
How different was their plan?
But anyway, your analogy about lancing the boil fits very well with the
structural deficit plans over 4, not 5 years. One could argue that Labours
idea to delay the "slash and burn" by 1 yea
-
> From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On
> Behalf Of Ian Murray
> Sent: 03 May 2011 22:52
> To: Joe Skinner
> Cc: LEEDSLIST
> Subject: Re: [LU] Good omen?
>
>
> It hurts when you lance a boil, and a boil doesn't kill you, but
: LEEDSLIST
Subject: Re: [LU] Good omen?
It hurts when you lance a boil, and a boil doesn't kill you, but we all know
that in the long term you're better off having lanced it.
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman-new.green
> security specifically for some people etc.
>
> I don't really car either way, no one can disprove or not the theory that
> they are good for tourism but if you look at this weekend alone, that means
> if they're not, then there are at least 1,000,000 stone col
anjamesmur...@hotmail.com]
Sent: 03 May 2011 13:03
To: Mark Humphries
Cc: ; Leeds list; LEEDSLIST
Subject: Re: [LU] Good omen?
Right, I rather imagine that this is becoming slightly boring for everyone (me
included), but I have to respond to this email as it is pretty insulting.
You suggest that the whole
Can't really be arsed to trawl through lawtel and show examples for you but HRA
was a game changer which fundamentally altered the course of our jurisprudence.
All legislation is to be interpreted through the prism of the HRA, and when the
two clash the HRA is supreme. In other words, the judici
ople with money I'd start with footballers or their ilk - but
> its all the same thing. They were lucky to be born with football skills,
> some kids are lucky to be born to a successful businessman in the family.
> That’s life, I just get on with mine!
>
>
> -Orig
Ian,
Whilst I agree that the most vulnerable people in society do indeed require
some form of protection, my point that most of the principles included within
the ECHR and then enacted into English law via the HRA were already the
subjects of various acts of parliament is still valid. All the H
...@hotmail.com]
Sent: 03 May 2011 11:47
To: Mark Humphries
Cc: ; Leeds list; LEEDSLIST
Subject: Re: [LU] Good omen?
I do pay for them to swan around. Their travel is paid for out of public funds,
their civil list income is paid for out of public funds. I clearly literally do
pay them money. Why s
n the UK, or Cuba, or China, or France,
> or Libya, or USA. To blame that on the Queen is ridiculous.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On
> Behalf Of Ian Murray
> Sent: 02 May 2011 14:12
> To: m...
Hi Chris, well aware of this. The HRA is the main piece of constitutional
legislation in this country which guarantees the rights of individuals. It is
the most vulnerable people in our society who require it's protection the most
when the executive seeks to erode those rights (as it frequently
leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On
Behalf Of Ian Murray
Sent: 02 May 2011 14:12
To: m...@leeds-united.net
Cc: Leeds list; LEEDSLIST
Subject: Re: [LU] Good omen?
So, of all the tourists you bump into on your way to work, or whatever, you
give them a detailed questionnaire o
Morning Ian,
Damian was indeed alluding to the HRA.
and the way the judiciary is using it to protect the individual against
the state (as it is designed to do)
I think that is a little unfair on the judiciary as it is a broad sweeping
statement with nothing to back it up.
The judiciary (Jud
Next time you're up head out to Knoydart. That'll make yer legs ache, Ian.
Cold here tonight, frost!
Betty
On 2 May 2011 23:44, "Ian Murray" wrote:
> Yeah could say that. Cold up there n all.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 2 May 2011, at 23:23, barbaravi...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> On 02/05/2011 22:
On 02/05/2011 22:16, Ian Murray wrote:
We went up the 'tourist trail' now rebadged as 'mountain track'. Painful on the
calves like.
Still a trip everyone should take. Good views on the top?
bETTY
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http:/
Norwich won automatic promotion.
So it was doable.
Just not by us!
Sent from my iPad
Dr. Michael Benjamin
Community Psychiatrist
On May 2, 2011, at 10:16 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
> We went up the 'tourist trail' now rebadged as 'mountain track'. Painful on
> the calves like.
>
> Sent from my i
We went up the 'tourist trail' now rebadged as 'mountain track'. Painful on the
calves like.
Sent from my iPhone
On 2 May 2011, at 17:40, barbaravi...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 02/05/2011 17:04, Ian Murray wrote:
>> The know-all was right Betty
>
> Ian those wre reverse groats :-)
>
> Which route
I think he's talking about the human rights act, and the way the judiciary is
using it to protect the individual against the state (as it is designed to do),
and how our current government is doing it's best to have it repealed and
jumping up and down about how 'Parliament knows best'.
If we h
your kind words
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric B [mailto:barl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 02 May 2011 16:12
> To: Steve Gillen
> Cc: Ian Murray; LEEDSLIST
> Subject: Re: [LU] Good omen?
>
> Steve
>
> I have no problem with you. We have in fact met in early 2000s
On 02/05/2011 17:42, Nicholas Armit wrote:
Sorry, but did all you royalists get 2 days off for the wedding? I thought The
Thatch got rid of the May Bank Holiday...(could be well off base here).
Off base...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/feb/04/may-day-tradition-margaret-thatcher
With an
...the judiciary have powers that don't derive from Parliament.
Damian,
Could you expand what you mean, I'm curious.
Cheers
Chris
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To uns
: Ian Murray; LEEDSLIST
Subject: Re: [LU] Good omen?
Steve
I have no problem with you. We have in fact met in early 2000s, I met you
and your lovely wife outside of ER to give you some tickets I got for you. I
dont remember which game it was but Im sure we won!
Im currently looking for a job and Im
t: Re: [LU] Good omen?
On 02/05/2011 16:21, Damian Walsh wrote:
> our Constitutional Monarchy
> perpetuates a system
that allows some gimp to have his wedding up some big church and then a bash
for 600 afterwards whilst there is a strong case for Invergordon Registry
Office and 120 bring
On 02/05/2011 17:04, Ian Murray wrote:
The know-all was right Betty
Ian those wre reverse groats :-)
Which route did you use for the Beinn? Carn Mor Dearg Ridge is the very
chap!
Betty
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman-
The know-all was right Betty. I spent quite alot of my hard earned in the far
North. I decided to camp in Glen Nevis and climb the mountain this weekend to
escape all the cr@p. Good few pots of real ale at the end in the Ben Nevis Inn
(or whatever it's called). I can heartily recommend crofters
On 02/05/2011 16:21, Damian Walsh wrote:
our Constitutional Monarchy
perpetuates a system
that allows some gimp to have his wedding up some big church and then a
bash for 600 afterwards whilst there is a strong case for Invergordon
Registry Office and 120 bringing a bottle and some food to P
Seriously though - the "economic" argument is a huge red herring. If the
only objection to Royalty was their cost then I think we would all prefer to
pay for them rather than risk some of the clowns that "preside" over other
countries.
However, as someone already alluded to, our Constitutional Mo
point you may
> have been making
>
> -Original Message-
> From: eric Barlier [mailto:barl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 02 May 2011 14:49
> To: Ian Murray
> Cc: Steve Gillen; LEEDSLIST
> Subject: Re: [LU] Good omen?
>
> oh my dear... steve you are not "the coldest beer
contribute
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
-Original Message-
From: "Robert Heath"
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 16:15:12
To: Ian Murray;
Cc: Leeds list; LEEDSLIST
Subject: Re: [LU] Good omen?
Just catching up on the parasitology thread.
Have to say that Ian Murray is wipin
work as a trade ambassador
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
-Original Message-
From: Ian Murray
Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 14:11:55
To: m...@leeds-united.net
Cc: Leeds list; Steve
Gillen; LEEDSLIST
Subject: Re: [LU] Good omen?
So, of all the tourists you bump into on your way to work, o
t; gawp at how stupid you are" which tends to destroy any viable point you may
> have been making
>
> -Original Message-
> From: eric Barlier [mailto:barl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 02 May 2011 14:49
> To: Ian Murray
> Cc: Steve Gillen; LEEDSLIST
> Subject: Re: [LU] G
ming to
> gawp at how stupid you are" which tends to destroy any viable point you may
> have been making
>
> -Original Message-
> From: eric Barlier [mailto:barl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 02 May 2011 14:49
> To: Ian Murray
> Cc: Steve Gillen; LEEDSLIST
> Subject:
to destroy any viable point you may
have been making
-Original Message-
From: eric Barlier [mailto:barl...@gmail.com]
Sent: 02 May 2011 14:49
To: Ian Murray
Cc: Steve Gillen; LEEDSLIST
Subject: Re: [LU] Good omen?
oh my dear... steve you are not "the coldest beer in the fridge"
Just catching up on the parasitology thread.
Have to say that Ian Murray is wiping the floor with the Royalists.
As for the latter, is the spurious "fact" that the so-called Royals generate a
big tourist income the best argument you can come up with in their favour? Even
if that were provably t
oh my dear... steve you are not "the coldest beer in the fridge" when it comes
to UK royal history, thats pretty evident.
Do you know how "foreign" your royalties are? Who in the royal family is not of
foreign heritage? In fact the french royalties were often close allies in war,
as well as en
which we don't
> have, the wine tourism, skiing, surfing, etc... They have so much more
> because they are bigger.
>
> Anyway how are Leeds doing??
>
>
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Murray
>
gn.apc.org
Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 22:03:14
To: Steve Gillen
Cc: LEEDSLIST
Subject: Re: [LU] Good omen?
PS No, sorry, you're right. People come to the UK in the actual expectation of
meeting the Queen and all her little parasitic little children. That's the only
reason and nobody wou
At least we'd get to vote for em. The very concept that someone is seen as
being better and more important than someone else by virtue of their ancestors
killing more folk is completely and utterly perverse.
It won't last for that much longer.
Sent from my iPhone
On 1 May 2011, at 22:11, "Dr.
When you get a serial rapist as president, not to mention a whole list of
degenerates in other places, having one family bearing, bringing up and
training from birth a sovereign not to be a complete dangerous arsehole has a
few attractions.
The best thing to be said about monarchy is that ever
PS No, sorry, you're right. People come to the UK in the actual expectation of
meeting the Queen and all her little parasitic little children. That's the only
reason and nobody would ever dream of coming here if we got rid if them. Sorry
for getting that so wrong.
Sent from my iPhone
On 1 May
People go to Paris for the weather?
Sent from my iPhone
On 1 May 2011, at 21:52, "Steve Gillen" wrote:
>
> They have wormer weather and better food than us, hence more visitors,
>
>
> France is the most visited country on earth and they did to their royalty
> what we should have done centur
They have wormer weather and better food than us, hence more visitors,
France is the most visited country on earth and they did to their royalty
what we should have done centuries ago.
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman-new
ies"
wrote:
> 100%
>
> If you want a republic, there are countries you can go to..
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Murray [mailto:ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com]
> Sent: 01 May 2011 16:32
> To: Mark Humphries
> Cc: Mark Stephenson; LEEDSLIS
I thought the original point was whether QE2 wearing Yellow and Blue was a good
omen. Well, she did, and we won, so was it?
How do we get her to wear it every week? Another letter to Lord Harewood?
Cheers
Paul
Steve G wrote:
Which neatly beings us back to my original point - or what I was tryin
: 01 May 2011 20:40
To: 'Ian Murray'
Cc: 'LEEDSLIST'
Subject: Re: [LU] Good omen?
100%
If you want a republic, there are countries you can go to..
-Original Message-
From: Ian Murray [mailto:ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com]
Sent: 01 May 2011 16:32
To: Mark Humphries
Cc: Mark S
100%
If you want a republic, there are countries you can go to..
-Original Message-
From: Ian Murray [mailto:ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com]
Sent: 01 May 2011 16:32
To: Mark Humphries
Cc: Mark Stephenson; LEEDSLIST
Subject: Re: [LU] Good omen?
She has no say constitutionally? Sure about
, fabulous history and some
> people would be happier with streets full of portacabins and president
> Cameron as the head of state.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On
> Behalf Of Mark Stephenson
> Sent: 3
slist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On
Behalf Of Mark Stephenson
Sent: 30 April 2011 20:31
To: 'LEEDSLIST'
Subject: Re: [LU] Good omen?
Matt
I think you'll find that that most of the tourists come to look at the old
houses of the current royal family's dead relatives.
If anyone thinks that t
phries
Cc: 'leedslist'; 'Simon Hart'; e...@morrish.org
Subject: Re: [LU] Good omen?
by all means pay for the old bag and Phil the Greek if it's to support
tourism, but all those bloody chancers with their snouts in the trough as
well? I think not!
--- On Sat, 30/4/11,
; Mark Humphries; John Lee;
leedslist; Eric B
Subject: Re: RE: [LU] Good omen?
Yes, thank God for Prince Andrew: drinking with convicted paedophiles so
that you don't have to.
Ed.
On 1 May 2011 11:00, "Matt Anderson" wrote:
> I would add Prince Andrew into that.
>
>
g]
On
> Behalf Of John Lee
> Sent: 30 April 2011 22:51
> To: 'Eric B'; 'Steve Gillen'; Mark Humphries
> Cc: 'leedslist'; 'Simon Hart'; e...@morrish.org
> Subject: Re: [LU] Good omen?
>
>
>
> by all means pay for the old bag and Phil the G
From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On
Behalf Of John Lee
Sent: 30 April 2011 22:51
To: 'Eric B'; 'Steve Gillen'; Mark Humphries
Cc: 'leedslist'; 'Simon Hart'; e...@morrish.org
Subject: Re: [LU] Good omen?
by all means p
Ive no idea an dont really care.
From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On
Behalf Of Mark Stephenson
Sent: 30 April 2011 20:31
To: 'LEEDSLIST'
Subject: Re: [LU] Good omen?
Matt
I think you'll find that that most of the tourists come to
by all means pay for the old bag and Phil the Greek if it's to support tourism,
but all those bloody chancers with their snouts in the trough as well? I think
not!
--- On Sat, 30/4/11, Mark Humphries wrote:
From: Mark Humphries
Subject: Re: [LU] Good omen?
To: "'Eric B
K be looking at introducing
pharaohs and pyramids also.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On
Behalf Of Michael ALCOCK
Sent: Sunday, 1 May 2011 4:28 AM
To: m...@leeds-united.net
Cc: leedslist; Simon Hart; e...@morrish.org
Subject: Re:
...@googlemail.com] o
Sent: 30 April 2011 19:28
To: m...@leeds-united.net
Cc: Mark Humphries; leedslist; Simon Hart; e...@morrish.org
Subject: Re: [LU] Good omen?
Matt,
Where's the evidence for the that figure? I'm always told the Royal Family
are a net financial benefit to the UK, but
travel half way round the world to be here too.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org]
> On
> > Behalf Of Eric B
> > Sent: 30 April 2011 09:11
> > To: Steve Gillen
> > Cc: leedslist; e..
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
