Re: [LU] If i were t'gaffer

2023-02-16 Thread Ed Morrish
Isn’t the point of wingbacks that you don’t have to have conventional wingers? Agree it would be the best use of Firpo, but it would make the team as a whole worse… Sent from my iPhone > On 16 Feb 2023, at 12:18, Richard Walker via Leedslist > wrote: > >  I don't think we can accomodate a

Re: [LU] If i were t'gaffer

2023-02-16 Thread Richard Walker via Leedslist
I don't think we can accomodate a left back that can't defend. He will cause us problems. Firpo nearly always get booked in games as he hasn't the pace or know how to defend on his back foot.  On Thursday, 16 February 2023 at 10:49:56 GMT, nattan--- via Leedslist wrote: My mates and

Re: [LU] If i were t'gaffer

2023-02-16 Thread nattan--- via Leedslist
My mates and I were discussing whether 3 at the back with 2 wing backs would be our best option  - wober , koch and cooper or Struijk.  Firpo has looked decent going forward but suspect defensively,  so wing back should suit him. The new US  pairing in centre mid looks dynamic and destructive 

[LU] If i were t'gaffer

2023-02-15 Thread Robert Heath
If I were in charge at Leeds (which, let's face it, is not as outlandish a prospect as it was 10 days ago, given how far down his list Victor Orta is going), I would play a flexible 5-2-3: Ayling & Firpo as wingbacks; Kock, Cooper & Wober CBs; Adams & McK in midfield; and a front 3 of Wilf,