Re: [LU] LU: McCormack

2014-08-10 Thread Andy Kneale
ances). Thanks Ross - goodbye, and a curse on your new team! Gaffer > Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2014 19:31:39 +0100 > From: nat...@sky.com > To: leedslist@gn.apc.org > Subject: Re: [LU] LU: McCormack > > I don't mean to be a t@at but WHO CARES ? He has gone, end of. Whether his

Re: [LU] LU: McCormack

2014-08-10 Thread Dr Michael Benjamin
Oh dear. Rich Walker will be having an apoplexy. :) On 10 Aug 2014 21:35, "nat...@sky.com" wrote: > I don't mean to be a t@at but WHO CARES ? He has gone, end of. Whether > his fitness is down to him or McDermott etc it does not matter - he is not > Leeds and nor, any longer, are the people who w

Re: [LU] LU: McCormack

2014-08-10 Thread nat...@sky.com
I don't mean to be a t@at but WHO CARES ? He has gone, end of. Whether his fitness is down to him or McDermott etc it does not matter - he is not Leeds and nor, any longer, are the people who were responsible for his fitness The same applies to Tom Lees - whether he ends up in the 4th Division or

Re: [LU] LU: McCormack

2014-08-10 Thread Phill Shields
Naef ,leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] LU: McCormack Well they obviously want a story so they make stuff up that he didn't say. Pretty rudimentary stuff in tabloid journalism school. He doesn't say anything about Leeds once in the quotes. Sent from my iPhone > On 10 Aug 2

Re: [LU] LU: McCormack

2014-08-10 Thread Ian Murray
Well they obviously want a story so they make stuff up that he didn't say. Pretty rudimentary stuff in tabloid journalism school. He doesn't say anything about Leeds once in the quotes. Sent from my iPhone > On 10 Aug 2014, at 22:03, "Phill Shields" wrote: > > Richard, > > I read this dif

Re: [LU] LU: McCormack

2014-08-10 Thread Richard Walker
Anyone who has watched Macca over the past few years knows that despite his ability he has fitness issues. He's a little porker who will always finds things difficult against pacey, clued up defenders. There's not many of them in the Championship so he'll probably be ok but I can't see him repea

Re: [LU] LU: McCormack

2014-08-10 Thread Phill Shields
Richard, I read this differently. He is saying he was unfit before preseason and the clue is in the title of the article. MOT Phill On 10 Aug 2014 14:47, Richard Naef wrote: > > https://www.clubcall.com/championship/magath-slams-leeds-1735777.html > tbf in the article Magath doesn't mention

Re: [LU] LU: McCormack

2014-08-10 Thread Richard Naef
> > https://www.clubcall.com/championship/magath-slams-leeds-1735777.html > tbf in the article Magath doesn't mention Leeds at all and all he says is that he needs to improve his fitness ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.gr

[LU] LU: McCormack

2014-08-10 Thread Phill Shields
https://www.clubcall.com/championship/magath-slams-leeds-1735777.html This is hilarious and reflects so badly on Fulham and the player. So what do their medical team actually check when they carry out a "fitness" test on a prospective signing? It can't be just dodgy knees or ankles?? They still