[LU] Play-offs - result

2011-05-25 Thread David Brennan
Well I've gone back through the last few digests, and the result of the for or against the play-offs vote is... For - Seven Against - Six That included a couple of votes that were both for AND against, which I've put one vote in each section for, as foolishly I didn't offer an abstain option :-

Re: [LU] Play-offs - result

2011-05-25 Thread barbaraville
On 25/05/2011 09:43, David Brennan wrote: === as opposed to being a plastic ChelArseManPool "fan". or in Voicey's misguided World of Didsbury, a Man Citeh fan - bet his new best mates didn't give him the dogs abuse we did :-) Chantelle would be appalled. Bet

Re: [LU] Play-offs - result

2011-05-25 Thread Mark Humphries
43 To: 'leedslist@gn.apc.org' Subject: [LU] Play-offs - result Well I've gone back through the last few digests, and the result of the for or against the play-offs vote is... For - Seven Against - Six That included a couple of votes that were both for AND against, which I've put one vot

Re: [LU] Play-offs - result

2011-05-25 Thread Tim Leslie
boun...@gn.apc.org] On > Behalf Of David Brennan > Sent: 25 May 2011 09:43 > To: 'leedslist@gn.apc.org' > Subject: [LU] Play-offs - result > > Well I've gone back through the last few digests, and the result of the for > or against the play-offs vote is... > > F