;
> Sent: Sunday, October 1, 2017 3:32:23 PM
> To: {broken-address} Nicholas Armit; Rob Heath
> Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org; {broken-address}
> Subject: Re: [LU] Wednesday 1 Leeds 0 (Hooper 25)
>
> O'Kane is proper rubbish !
> On Sunday, 1 October 2017, 13:13:22 BST, Rob Heath &
n.apc.org>; {broken-address}
<seanscr...@aol.com-is-broken.gn.apc.org>
Sent: Sun, Oct 1, 2017 9:35 am
Subject: Re: [LU] Wednesday 1 Leeds 0 (Hooper 25)
Ha, mine's alcohol.Sent from my iPhone> On 1 Oct 2017, at 14:34, Michael
Benjamin <m...@myray.com> wrote:> >
{broken-address} <seanscr...@aol.com-is-broken.gn.apc.org>
> Subject: Re: [LU] Wednesday 1 Leeds 0 (Hooper 25)
>
> Whilst I wouldn't necessarily subscribe to the doc's pessimism, that's
> another game where we have been truly awful. Sky had a stat up first half
> that basically
myray.com>; leedslist@gn.apc.org; {broken-address}
Richard Walker <richleed...@yahoo.co.uk.is-broken.gn.apc.org>; {broken-address}
<seanscr...@aol.com-is-broken.gn.apc.org>
Subject: Re: [LU] Wednesday 1 Leeds 0 (Hooper 25)
Whilst I wouldn't necessarily subscribe to the doc's p
en.gn.apc.org>
>> Sent: Sunday, October 1, 2017 3:32:23 PM
>> To: {broken-address} Nicholas Armit; Rob Heath
>> Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org; {broken-address}
>> Subject: Re: [LU] Wednesday 1 Leeds 0 (Hooper 25)
>>
>> O'Kane is proper rubbish !
>> On S
apc.org>
> Sent: Sunday, October 1, 2017 3:32:23 PM
> To: {broken-address} Nicholas Armit; Rob Heath
> Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org; {broken-address}
> Subject: Re: [LU] Wednesday 1 Leeds 0 (Hooper 25)
>
> O'Kane is proper rubbish !
> On Sunday, 1 October 2017, 13:13:22 BST, Ro
...@yahoo.com-is-broken.gn.apc.org>;
> Rob Heath <rhe...@hkis.edu.hk>; {broken-address} Richard Walker <
> richleed...@yahoo.co.uk.is-broken.gn.apc.org>; leedslist@gn.apc.org;
> {broken-address} <seanscr...@aol.com-is-broken.gn.apc.org>
> Subject: Re: [LU] Wednes
pc.org;
{broken-address} <seanscr...@aol.com-is-broken.gn.apc.org>
Subject: Re: [LU] Wednesday 1 Leeds 0 (Hooper 25)
Jesus Mike how about more overreactions. We are 4th after 11 games. How is that
a wasted year so far? I would have taken that in August.
Nick
Sent from my iPhone
> On
t; To: {broken-address} Nicholas Armit; Rob Heath
> Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org; {broken-address}
> Subject: Re: [LU] Wednesday 1 Leeds 0 (Hooper 25)
>
> O'Kane is proper rubbish !
>On Sunday, 1 October 2017, 13:13:22 BST, Rob Heath <rhe...@hkis.edu.hk>
> wrote:
>
&g
oken-address} Nicholas Armit; Rob Heath
Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org; {broken-address}
Subject: Re: [LU] Wednesday 1 Leeds 0 (Hooper 25)
O'Kane is proper rubbish !
On Sunday, 1 October 2017, 13:13:22 BST, Rob Heath <rhe...@hkis.edu.hk>
wrote:
We were comfortably on top until the def
;>
> >>>> Anyone else think that Wiedwald was completely at fault in that goal?
> >> He hesitated instead of challenging for the ball. I think he is turning
> out
> >> to be a massive weak link in our defence.
> >>>>
>
ted instead of challenging for the ball. I think he is turning
> out
> >> to be a massive weak link in our defence.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -Original Message-
> >>>> From: John Boocock <j...@boocock.ne
nce.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: John Boocock <j...@boocock.net>
>>>> To: leedslist <leedslist@gn.apc.org>
>>>> Sent: Sun, Oct 1, 2017 7:53 am
>>>&g
weak link in our defence.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: John Boocock <j...@boocock.net>
> >> To: leedslist <leedslist@gn.apc.org>
> >> Sent: Sun, Oct 1, 2017 7:53 am
> >> Subject: [LU] Wedn
t in that goal? He
hesitated instead of challenging for the ball. I think he is turning out to
be a massive weak link in our defence.
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: John Boocock <j...@boocock.net>
>> To: leedslist <leedslist@gn.apc.org>
&
; be a massive weak link in our defence.
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: John Boocock <j...@boocock.net>
>> To: leedslist <leedslist@gn.apc.org>
>> Sent: Sun, Oct 1, 2017 7:53 am
>> Subject:
hink he is turning out to
> be a massive weak link in our defence.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Boocock <j...@boocock.net>
> To: leedslist <leedslist@gn.apc.org>
> Sent: Sun, Oct 1, 2017 7:53 am
> Subject: [LU] Wednesday 1 Leeds 0 (Hooper 25)
>
>
llenging for the ball. I think he is turning out to
> be a massive weak link in our defence.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Boocock <j...@boocock.net>
> To: leedslist <leedslist@gn.apc.org>
> Sent: Sun, Oct 1, 2017 7:53 am
> Subject: [
n.apc.org>
Sent: Sun, Oct 1, 2017 7:53 am
Subject: [LU] Wednesday 1 Leeds 0 (Hooper 25)
Wednesday 1 Leeds 0 (Hooper 25)
According to my spies we should be three down
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listin
Wednesday 1 Leeds 0 (Hooper 25)
According to my spies we should be three down
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
FLAME WARS 'R US
20 matches
Mail list logo
