Re: enlarging turning capacity of a legacy

2015-01-27 Thread Tim Krause
The Trim your posts is a note to the people whom primarily use email and have long trails of quotes that are not needed to add to the conversation. You just delete that portion of your message. You cannot go back and edit out long quotes in google groups. Even as an owner of the group I can

Re: enlarging turning capacity of a legacy

2015-01-27 Thread 'joe biunno' via Legacy Ornamental Mills
tim, i calculated things as follows...the machine currently is capable of 11 5/8, inside of the bed rails...i am shooting for 18 so i thought 6 1/2 should get me there...but when you are doing an 18 piece, your rough glue up will be bigger, of course...so i did want a bit more...so i went

Re: enlarging turning capacity of a legacy

2015-01-27 Thread 'joe biunno' via Legacy Ornamental Mills
tim, haven't lengthened the slot that the bed support bracket slides in...not yet, anyway...wasn't sure if it was going to be necessary...some preliminary calculations said maybe not, but now that the prototype is done, i see that the slot needs to be lengthened about 3...but that is why

Re: enlarging turning capacity of a legacy

2015-01-27 Thread 'joe biunno' via Legacy Ornamental Mills
hey mac, you are correct...generally, the largest pole we do is 3 in diameter...but we also make furniture...and i can see( and have made in the past) a turned and fluted column for a center pedestal table...and we have done the type where the column splits in half when the table

RE: enlarging turning capacity of a legacy

2015-01-27 Thread Bill Bulkeley
If you never intend to spiral and only flute the larger dia work ,I would have simply built another whole mill to accommodate the large dia it would only have to turn the work and index it, all easy things to obtain. I seem to remember someone on the group doing that a few years back with

Re: enlarging turning capacity of a legacy

2015-01-27 Thread 'joe biunno' via Legacy Ornamental Mills
tim, can you be a bit more specific when you saychanging the formula?...i do understand that if i complete the mod and i am turning a 16 diameter piece, how the rate of feed from the lead screw will be much different than if i was turning a 4 diameter piece...but are there other surprises

Re: enlarging turning capacity of a legacy

2015-01-27 Thread 'joe biunno' via Legacy Ornamental Mills
bill, i don't anticipate doing spirals on a big piece but that does not mean i won't ever have a need to do them...i would like to keep my options open...and build another 16 ft. mill?...i don't think so...this is a one and done machine for me...and i will admit, to do an 18 column 15 ft.

Re: enlarging turning capacity of a legacy

2015-01-27 Thread 'joe biunno' via Legacy Ornamental Mills
bill, not sure about the gear train reaching...i am increasing the machine by 8, but that gets cut in half to 4 since the gear train works from the center line out to the lead screw...but i have worked out what i need to do if it needs to be lengthened...and i have all the necessary gears

Re: enlarging turning capacity of a legacy

2015-01-27 Thread Tim Krause
Changing the formula in the sense that making the machine wider helps the diameter, but the spindle will have to drop 8 inches or a little more to get a 16 piece. The other way to think is also to raise the y axis some. A model would show all the issues. Regarding the drive train, I'm

RE: double sided tape

2015-01-27 Thread Bill Bulkeley
That is very interesting thank you I have decided to try it to hold my bench tops down and if i have any over i will try it as a clamping system on flat work on the legacy Bill From: legacy-ornamental-mills@googlegroups.com [mailto:legacy-ornamental-mills@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Joe

Re: double sided tape

2015-01-27 Thread Joe Gassen
I know this is old, but the best source I have found is Amazon. I use it to bond Stainless to glass in all-glass storefront systems. They are 45 degree and 90 degree angles that do not use a center screw like other pieces. It really holds well. On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Bill Bulkeley