Re: Accurate setup

2017-02-15 Thread CURTIS GEORGE
Wait. One more thing. did you say you were ??? stopping the movement of the router between cuts??? 5. rotate the work piece 1 revolution. 6. Move router abour 5/8" to the right 7. Repeat steps 5 and 6 until reaching the head end of the work piece. The ridges can easily be felt and are not jus

Re: Accurate setup

2017-02-15 Thread CURTIS GEORGE
HI Jim There has been a lot of good information given here on your topic. Have you tried to make one very light pass on the wood and see the results? Yes set-up and alignment is important, and making sure that the router bit is true too. BUT for what I see form your picture it could just be you

Re: Accurate setup

2017-02-15 Thread Okla Mike (Liltwisted)
One thing you may look into is the square of the router. If one side, left or right, is high, it will do what we are seeing here. Also if the router is allowed to lift because of pressure it will do this. If all is close enough and you take a clean out final pass, start it half the distance

Re: Accurate setup

2017-02-15 Thread 'joe biunno' via Legacy Ornamental Mills
I would think you should decrease your rate of feed as much as possible, or increase the spindle RPM's...5/8" in one revolution is a fast feed, in my opinion...but then again, you don't want to stand there for an extended period of time while the router moves from one end to the other...but I do

Re: Accurate setup

2017-02-15 Thread Jim Riggen
First off, thank you all for your comments. I am learning a lot. The accuracy I am concerned with is that of the setup. How accurate does the setup have to be to get rid of the ridges that remain after I turn the work piece to diameter. The attached photos will (I hope) show the ridges. The pro

Re: Accurate setup

2017-02-15 Thread Tim Krause
Hi Jim, Can you take a photo of your results? The offset of the routerbit is more important than the four corner measurements. For starters, is the 2704 bit really flat? The offset of the bit can be anywhere from where the tip of the touches center to just short of the center of the bit. If the

Re: Accurate setup

2017-02-15 Thread 'joe biunno' via Legacy Ornamental Mills
forgot to ask, how well does the tailstock line up with the headstock?...a .004" misalignment will produce a .009 taper...and the legacy design, in regards to headstock and tailstock, while very adequate for all that it needs to do, certainly is prone to a small misalignment...joe > > >>> --

Re: Accurate setup

2017-02-15 Thread 'joe biunno' via Legacy Ornamental Mills
my two cents...nine thousandths, .009, to me is an acceptable tolerance for a piece done on a legacy machine...there are times when we are cutting up some solids for a job and overnight I have seen a difference of thirty thousandths, .030 or 1/32",the next day...I have even gotten drawings from