options.
-Tim
- Original Message -
From: Bill Bulkeley
To: legacy-ornamental-mills@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2016 9:57 AM
Subject: RE: Question for all? on the Wave attachment.
I think tims wave attachment would be the easiest to make perhaps with his
perm
ills
[mailto:legacy-ornamental-mills@googlegroups.com]
Sent: Friday, 30 December 2016 1:47 AM
To: legacy-ornamental-mills@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Question for all? on the Wave attachment.
re: wave , I don't respond often but really like to get into making waves, I
have been reluc
ntal-mills@googlegroups.com]
Sent: Friday, 30 December 2016 1:47 AM
To: legacy-ornamental-mills@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Question for all? on the Wave attachment.
re: wave , I don't respond often but really like to get into making waves, I
have been reluctant to start for lack of more pre
re: wave , I don't respond often but really like to get into making waves, I
have been reluctant to start for lack of more precise dimensions for the
components. I have a 1200 Legacy.
On Wednesday, December 28, 2016 9:39 AM, Bill Bulkeley
wrote:
#yiv7014013627 -- filtered {panose-1:2
x's. Legacy? I made a wave
> attachment for him Years ago. (I would think it would be with his machine?
> I do remember someone with in our group bought it form him...)
>
> Its getting late.
> talk to you and all more Tomorrow.
>
> C.A.G.
> ------
Hi Curtis, i like your wave attachment, i can see it has a lot of
possibilities
if you had to make another one would you change anything on it?
Roger
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 8:07 AM, CURTIS GEORGE
wrote:
>
> Hello and Good morning everyone.
> Unless someone starts asking questions or comments,
HI Richard
Dont forget to send us some pictures of this project of yours. I would very
much like to see it.
C.A.G.
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Ellis"
To: "Legacy Ornamental Mills"
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2016 2:32:16 PM
Subject: Re: Question
day, 29 December 2016 1:08 AM
> *To:* legacy-orna...@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: Question for all? on the Wave attachment.
>
>
>
>
>
> Hello and Good morning everyone.
>
> Unless someone starts asking questions or comments, this will be the last
> segment
@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Question for all? on the Wave attachment.
Hello and Good morning everyone.
Unless someone starts asking questions or comments, this will be the last
segment on the wave attachment for a while.
To Recap the topic, I would like to say although this is a concept, taken
I also would like to know more
On Monday, December 26, 2016 at 1:45:26 PM UTC-5, Curtis wrote:
>
> I received an E-mail from one person with in our group, asking me to
> explain how I made my Wave Attachment and How I use it.
> I am planing to make a few postings and breakdown of what I do and ho
OK Peter.
The wheels are in motion... ;-)
C.A.G.
- Original Message -
From: "parr454 via Legacy Ornamental Mills"
To: legacy-ornamental-mills@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, December 26, 2016 7:03:57 PM
Subject: Re: Question for all? on the Wave attachment.
I would l
I would love to see how one is made & used
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Bill Bulkeley
To: legacy-ornamental-mills
Sent: Mon, Dec 26, 2016 6:24 pm
Subject: RE: Question for all? on the Wave attachment.
It is a shame the wave attachment has had notmuch interest it really
f of CURTIS GEORGE
>
> Sent: Monday, December 26, 2016 12:45 PM
> To: Legacy-Ornamental-Mills
> Subject: Question for all? on the Wave attachment.
>
> I received an E-mail from one person with in our group, asking me to explain
> how I made my Wave Attachment and How I use it.
>
finished. Just stained it yesterday
max
From: legacy-ornamental-mills@googlegroups.com
on behalf of CURTIS GEORGE
Sent: Monday, December 26, 2016 12:45 PM
To: Legacy-Ornamental-Mills
Subject: Question for all? on the Wave attachment.
I received an E-mail
14 matches
Mail list logo
