That may or may not be true. But this is not your run-of-the-mill
list. These posts, whether we agree with them or not, are off topic.
And allowing them to be posted, which no one did, only brings on hard
feelings and discussions that eventually turn nasty. We each have our
own religious and polit
I think that there is only one faith out there that might find that e-mail
offensive. And NOT all of them do.
- Original Message -
From: "Sherry/Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 11:59 AM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Fw: prayer for our Military
Ruth,
Not only
Yes, when you go to Customise the export, remove the QUAY tag
from "Export these items".
Jennifer
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Sara Binkley Tarpley
Sent: Wednesday, 4 July 2007 3:26 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject:
Is there any way to remove the surety level for sources from Gedcoms?
I have done it manually by editing the Gedcom, but is there any
setting in Legacy that will remove it? Although I am sure it is a
very useful feature for some users, it is less useful for those of us
who had extensive databases
Well the tag the parents of all with tag nr 1 first, then you get the
spouses parents. Then tag the rest with nr 2, then delete tag 1.
Anne
- Original Message -
From: "Cathy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 3:22 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Tagging
Hi Anne,
That'
Egad, what happened to my spell checker?
Art
- Original Message -
From: "aseddon.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 10:02 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Tagging
Hi Bob;
The simple way looks to my like:
Go to "View".
Go down to "Tree Finder".
In Tree Finder click "R
Hi Bob;
The simple way looks to my like:
Go to "View".
Go down to "Tree Finder".
In Tree Finder click "Refresh"
That will give you each separate Tree and the opportunity to tag each tree,
so you can tagg all of the trees but yours and you cah then go to "Tools"
aand the first entry is "Advanced
Gone off list.
Cathy
At 11:07 AM 4/07/2007, you wrote:
Thanks fore this Cathy.
There are 42 of them out of a total of 84 references.
I have tried to delete these but keep going around in circles - HELP
Regards from Valerie in sunny Sydney.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have you unlocked the real pow
Thanks fore this Cathy.
There are 42 of them out of a total of 84 references.
I have tried to delete these but keep going around in circles - HELP
Regards from Valerie in sunny Sydney.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Cath
Hi Valerie,
Look at the Master Source List
View > Master Lists - Source
Scroll down the list of sources and see if one is named TITLE.
You may need to sort out what source it really is and edit it - or if
you can't work out what it was meant to be from the people who are
using it, delete it. To
Is there a way to create a report for all the births, baptisms, marriages,
deaths that happened on a particular date? This would be like an "on this
day in history" type of list.
The calendar only gives options for birthdays and anniversaries and when I
tried to compose a search, when I selected
Thanks for this Wendy.
It is the word TITLE that appears as the information only in the
source ?
Also thanks for the rest of your message.
Regards from Valerie in sunny Sydney.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Wendy
Howard
Hi Valerie,
You need to look at that source itself to see what it says...
- If the "TITLE" itself is the problem, change it to what you want it
to say.
- If it is the repeating of the same item twice in the sources at the
end of your report, look closely at the two and work out what the
Cathy wrote
It's easy to tag all relatives whether you tag all descendants of end
of line ancestors or set relationships to yourself and use Search
Relationship equal to Related.
Thanks for clarifying that. I did wonder after I posted if there was a
quick way to tag all relatives as it seeme
That was great Cathy but why do I have this " TITIL " repeating itself
all the time.
Regards from Valerie in sunny Sydney.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Cathy
Sent: Tuesday, 3 July 2007 11:29 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacy
<>
No need to export a group just to tag it. Under >Name list > Search you have
the option to >show all untagged (choose the number), then you can go to
>Advanced Tagging and tag the current list. The tagging option has
tremendous capabilities.
http://oscox.org
Ruth,
Not only was the file 550 KB, way too large for many of our users, esp those
on dial-up, many of our users are from other countries and other faiths.
This is totally not appropriate for our list.
Thanks for using Legacy.
Sherry
Customer Support
Millennia Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http:
So we're getting so callous that we can't for one time receive something
that's so heartwarming and sad - only genealogy is important now? For
goodness sakes -
Ruth A. (Sconza Testa) Nerud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jan and Mary,
This is *DEFENITELY NOT* on topic. > I joined this list for informatio
It may not be "on topic", but I'm sure glad I was sent this so I could pass it
on.
Ruth A. (Sconza Testa) Nerud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Jan Hunt
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 8:18 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Fw: pray
Working with Valerie off-list.
Thanks for using Legacy.
Sherry
Customer Support
Millennia Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
We are changing the world of genealogy!
When replying to this message, please include all previous correspondence.
Thanks.
-Original Me
I have written directly to Mary about the inappropriateness of this posting.
PLEASE do not send messages to the list or directly to Mary chastising her!
Thanks for using Legacy.
Sherry
Customer Support
Millennia Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
We are changing the
On 03/07/07, Jan Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't believe this is on topic.
Jan and Mary,
This is *DEFENITELY NOT* on topic. Mary, while I appreciate this may
be very important to you, this is not an appropriate place to post
such an e-mail. It looks as if you may have sent this to
Hi Valerie,
I think I know what's going on.
Go to Options > Customise - Sources tab and uncheck Include the
Source List Name ... on reports
The Source List Name is really for your use to order the sources for
your convenience. The Source Title is for publication. Some begin the
Source List Na
Hi Anne,
That's fine, except that way you'll delete parents of spouses which
the OP didn't want to do.
Cathy
At 08:31 PM 3/07/2007, you wrote:
Well if you easily tag all relatives, won't be that hard to tag non-relatives.
Just tag all relatives with tag nr 1. Then tag everybody that do not
h
Valerie,
From Googling your error:
Symptom:
When running an application a message box pops up containing the error
message:
Run-time error '-2147024882 (8007000e)'
System Error &H80004005 (-2147467259). Unspecified error.
Meaning:
This error is a VB/VBA automation error. Details on how to
Valerie,
There is too little information here to be able to tell. On what report is
the source reproduced , what is the content of your Master Source and the
Detail and any other information would be welcome.
Ron Ferguson
(Glad it's sunny in Sydney - it sure ain't in Manchester UK!)
_
Well if you easily tag all relatives, won't be that hard to tag
non-relatives.
Just tag all relatives with tag nr 1. Then tag everybody that do not have
tag 1
with tag 2. The delete TAG 1, and there you have tagged all non relatives.
Anne
- Original Message -
From: "Cathy" <[EMAIL PRO
Example:
1. Registry of Deeds, Registry of Deeds
2. Blessington Records, Blessington Records
3. TITLE, TITLE
4. Ibid
5. Church Register, Church Register
6. TITLE, TITLE
What is going on, how did this happen, how do I fix it and how do
I make sure it does not happen again ?
Regards from
It's easy to tag all relatives whether you tag all descendants of end
of line ancestors or set relationships to yourself and use Search
Relationship equal to Related.
It's very difficult to tag non relatives.
The non relatives/in laws and their parents that the OP wanted to
include are easily
Hi everyone.
This is my first message as I am trying to learn Legacy.
I keep getting a " Runtime error " which then closes down the program.
One of them was '-2147024882 [8007000e]':
I don't know if these numbers mean anything nor whether I should copy
them every time it happens.
Looking forwar
Kate,
I should also have added that it would almost certainly be a breach of
copyright to download somebody's timeline and then publish.
Ron Ferguson
_
For Genealogy, Software and Social visit:
http://www.fergys.co.uk
*Ne
Kate,
There is an easier way by using a word processor. The timeline files are
only text files so you can open them in Notepad. When you do you will see
that Lagecy uses "|" as a field separator and "{/n}" as a carriage return.
Thus, in your word processor just replace "CRs" with "{/n}" and
Cathy wrote
You can export the group you are wanting to keep.
Tag all the relatives.
But the OP asked if there was an easy way to tag the non-relatives. I
suspect that tagging all the relatives would actually be a bigger job
than tagging the non-relatives.
I think it was the *easy* (implyi
Hi Bob,
You can export the group you are wanting to keep.
Tag all the relatives.
Export to a Legacy file the tagged group + their spouses, children and parents
Tick to include all the data (various checkboxes).
Keep your old file for when you discover that some of those discarded
in-laws are a
34 matches
Mail list logo
