Re: [LegacyUG] Personal Knowledge vs. Interview?

2009-07-04 Thread Paula Ryburn
Cathy, I have set up a "Personal Knowledge - " source for each of the relatives who have given me information.  (and I have one for me!)  When I cite the person, I put the date and type of "communication" in the detail. email, interview, phone call, letter, questionnaire, etc.  All of this

RE: [LegacyUG] Enter adopted parents family?

2009-07-04 Thread Paula Ryburn
Red,  I would add the information, because your daughter-in-law is obviously important to you, her adopted parents and their ancestors are important to her, and genealogy is important to you both.  Plus who knows what exciting discoveries you will find!  And that's the really fun part of genealo

Re: [LegacyUG] Conflict of Dates - how to note

2009-07-04 Thread RICHARD SCHULTHIES
I have dates I KNOW are impossible, but I leave them there, show why you don't accept it, check the problem to be ignored, then make a 'to do' to disprove the problem. My favorite is a baptism in the the church records on Feb 30, in a non-leap year. There were also baps on the 1st 2nd and third

Re: [LegacyUG] Conflict of Dates - how to note

2009-07-04 Thread Steve Voght
If you can't locate your original source for the birth date of the father, it's just as likely that you meant to enter 1877 as it is that 1887 is his actual birth year (or that the cemetery transcription you derived this from was in error for a similar reason.) I would either delete the original en

[LegacyUG] Conflict of Dates - how to note

2009-07-04 Thread Roy and Ila East
I just ran the potential problems report. On one record it was noted that the person was born when a parent was younger than 13 years old. I got the birth dates and date of death from cemetery files. I don't know where I got the birth date of the father. The year I have is 1887 and the year of